The Memory Destruction and Reconstruction Games within the Scope of Persianization Politics in Iran

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 16 · Barış, Adalet ve Güçlü Kurumlar

Özet

This research examines how collective memory management has influenced the images, symbols, historical artifacts, names, and language of Turkish culture in Iran since 1925 and how Turks for anti-discrimination have responded. This study employed a qualitative research model, with data collected through a relevant literature review and interviews. The sample was selected from Turks who have expressed reactions to the Persianization process. The findings were obtained through open and axial coding of the collected data and an inductive inquiry strategy. The findings revealed that, in line with the assimilation (Persianization) policies implemented in Iran, historiography and memory management practices based on Persian nationalism have been perpetuated against Turkish identity and its collective memory. This process is carried out by erasure, forgetting, amnesia, annulment, obsoletion, abandoning, humiliating, and banning symbolic representations, historical artifacts, names, and the language belonging to Turkish culture. The findings also demonstrated that Turks have not remained passive in the face of these practices but have actively sought to commemorate and preserve their language, names, historical events, artifacts, and heroes through artistic events, ceremonies, sports competitions, new media, legal channels and protests. From the selective coding of the findings, it can be concluded that the management of collective memory based on essentialist, monist, exclusionary and supremacist Persian nationalism are nowadays being questioned and debated in intellectual discussion, political competition and everyday life scenes. It can be concluded that the attitude of the political authority is not towards recognizing ethnonational diversity and their rights in Iran, but towards maintaining uncertainty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13999Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/jnmlp-2025-0003Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDinç, Artum
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:04.860500471Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:04.860500471Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThis research examines how collective memory management has influenced the images, symbols, historical artifacts, names, and language of Turkish culture in Iran since 1925 and how Turks for anti-discrimination have responded. This study employed a qualitative research model, with data collected through a relevant literature review and interviews. The sample was selected from Turks who have expressed reactions to the Persianization process. The findings were obtained through open and axial coding of the collected data and an inductive inquiry strategy. The findings revealed that, in line with the assimilation (Persianization) policies implemented in Iran, historiography and memory management practices based on Persian nationalism have been perpetuated against Turkish identity and its collective memory. This process is carried out by erasure, forgetting, amnesia, annulment, obsoletion, abandoning, humiliating, and banning symbolic representations, historical artifacts, names, and the language belonging to Turkish culture. The findings also demonstrated that Turks have not remained passive in the face of these practices but have actively sought to commemorate and preserve their language, names, historical events, artifacts, and heroes through artistic events, ceremonies, sports competitions, new media, legal channels and protests. From the selective coding of the findings, it can be concluded that the management of collective memory based on essentialist, monist, exclusionary and supremacist Persian nationalism are nowadays being questioned and debated in intellectual discussion, political competition and everyday life scenes. It can be concluded that the attitude of the political authority is not towards recognizing ethnonational diversity and their rights in Iran, but towards maintaining uncertainty.
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/jnmlp-2025-0003
dc.identifier.endpage74
dc.identifier.issn2570-5857
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012748876
dc.identifier.startpage43
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13999
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSciendo
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Nationalism Memory and Language Politics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAssimilation
dc.subjectCollective Memory
dc.subjectForgetting
dc.subjectHistoriography
dc.subjectPersian Nationalism
dc.subjectTurks in Iran
dc.titleThe Memory Destruction and Reconstruction Games within the Scope of Persianization Politics in Iran
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.2478/jnmlp-2025-0003
rdl.sdgSDG16
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS