Prioritization of Internal and External Corporate Sustainability Dimensions: Evidence from Sustainability Auditors Using AHP

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1

Özet

Corporate sustainability has traditionally been evaluated through environmental, social, and economic dimensions. However, increasing sustainability challenges, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory requirements indicate that sustainability extends beyond conventional performance measures and requires an integrated perspective that considers both internal organizational capabilities and external institutional conditions. This study develops an integrated internal–external sustainability framework and prioritizes sustainability dimensions from the perspective of licensed sustainability auditors in Türkiye. The proposed framework comprises governance, ethical, behavioral, cultural, environmental, social, economic, legal, and technological dimensions. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to pairwise comparison data collected from 15 licensed sustainability auditors to determine the relative importance of these dimensions. The results indicate that external sustainability dimensions received substantially higher priority (70.97%) than internal dimensions (29.03%), demonstrating that sustainability assessments are primarily shaped by environmental challenges, regulatory requirements, stakeholder expectations, technological developments, and market conditions. Among the nine corporate sustainability dimensions, environmental sustainability received the highest overall priority, followed by technological, ethical, social, economic, legal, governance, cultural, and behavioral dimensions. These findings suggest that although internal organizational capabilities remain important, corporate sustainability is predominantly influenced by external institutional and environmental factors. By proposing an integrated internal–external sustainability framework, this study extends conventional sustainability assessment approaches and contributes to the sustainability governance and assurance literature. The findings also provide practical implications for sustainability reporting, assurance, governance, and strategic decision-making by identifying the sustainability dimensions that deserve the greatest managerial and regulatory attention.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13436Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157763Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yufu
dc.contributor.authorYeşilçelebi, Gül
dc.contributor.authorTosunoğlu Kusan, Büşra
dc.contributor.authorÇam, Alper Veli
dc.contributor.authorDumitru, Mihaela
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:21.055302892Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:21.055302892Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractCorporate sustainability has traditionally been evaluated through environmental, social, and economic dimensions. However, increasing sustainability challenges, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory requirements indicate that sustainability extends beyond conventional performance measures and requires an integrated perspective that considers both internal organizational capabilities and external institutional conditions. This study develops an integrated internal–external sustainability framework and prioritizes sustainability dimensions from the perspective of licensed sustainability auditors in Türkiye. The proposed framework comprises governance, ethical, behavioral, cultural, environmental, social, economic, legal, and technological dimensions. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to pairwise comparison data collected from 15 licensed sustainability auditors to determine the relative importance of these dimensions. The results indicate that external sustainability dimensions received substantially higher priority (70.97%) than internal dimensions (29.03%), demonstrating that sustainability assessments are primarily shaped by environmental challenges, regulatory requirements, stakeholder expectations, technological developments, and market conditions. Among the nine corporate sustainability dimensions, environmental sustainability received the highest overall priority, followed by technological, ethical, social, economic, legal, governance, cultural, and behavioral dimensions. These findings suggest that although internal organizational capabilities remain important, corporate sustainability is predominantly influenced by external institutional and environmental factors. By proposing an integrated internal–external sustainability framework, this study extends conventional sustainability assessment approaches and contributes to the sustainability governance and assurance literature. The findings also provide practical implications for sustainability reporting, assurance, governance, and strategic decision-making by identifying the sustainability dimensions that deserve the greatest managerial and regulatory attention.
dc.description.sponsorshipGümüşhane Üniversitesi, GU, (25.A0115.02.01)
dc.description.sponsorshipGümüşhane Üniversitesi, GU
dc.identifier.articlenumber7763
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su18157763
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue15
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105047176643
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13436
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001847102900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability (Switzerland)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectanalytic hierarchy process
dc.subjectcorporate governance
dc.subjectcorporate sustainability
dc.subjectESG reporting
dc.subjectsustainability auditing
dc.subjectsustainability governance
dc.subjectsustainable development
dc.subject.classificationGreen & Sustainable Science & Technology
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Studies
dc.subject.classificationScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otheranalytical hierarchy process
dc.subject.othercorporate strategy
dc.subject.otherenvironmental impact
dc.subject.othergovernance approach
dc.subject.otherprioritization
dc.subject.othersocial impact
dc.subject.othersustainability
dc.subject.othersustainable development
dc.titlePrioritization of Internal and External Corporate Sustainability Dimensions: Evidence from Sustainability Auditors Using AHP
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/15/7763/pdf?version=1785506681
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)