The Problem of Language in Thomas Kuhn: Aristotelian Physics and Hermeneutics

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Comprehending both outdated or superseded and competitive “paradigms” in a common ground, in other words, the conceptualisation of “scientific revolutions” underlies the core idea of the works of Thomas Kuhn. Related with this topic, in his writings after 80s Kuhn shows a hermeneutics based expansion within the frame of a partial linguistic innovation and especially as an alternative to Quine’s translation method. Moreover, he asserts that this expansion had influenced his approaches of the history of science in the 1960s in some sense. In this study, we put forward an analysis of Aristotle reading on which Kuhn based his understanding-oriented approach within the framework of “What are Scientific Revolutions?” So, by making a general criticism of Kuhn’s reception of Aristotle’s Physics, it is aimed to seek the possibilities of different perspectives to Kuhn’s linguistic turn after the 80s.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/18045Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.539667Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ümit
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:39:31.884134152Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:39:31.884134152Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractComprehending both outdated or superseded and competitive “paradigms” in a common ground, in other words, the conceptualisation of “scientific revolutions” underlies the core idea of the works of Thomas Kuhn. Related with this topic, in his writings after 80s Kuhn shows a hermeneutics based expansion within the frame of a partial linguistic innovation and especially as an alternative to Quine’s translation method. Moreover, he asserts that this expansion had influenced his approaches of the history of science in the 1960s in some sense. In this study, we put forward an analysis of Aristotle reading on which Kuhn based his understanding-oriented approach within the framework of “What are Scientific Revolutions?” So, by making a general criticism of Kuhn’s reception of Aristotle’s Physics, it is aimed to seek the possibilities of different perspectives to Kuhn’s linguistic turn after the 80s.
dc.identifier.doi10.20981/kaygi.539667
dc.identifier.eissn2645-8950
dc.identifier.endpage205
dc.identifier.issn1303-4251
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage188
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/18045
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofKaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBeşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectFizik, Matematik
dc.subjectBilim Felsefesi ve Tarihi
dc.subjectFelsefe
dc.subjectFizik, Partiküller ve Alanlar
dc.subjectEdebi Teori ve Eleştiri
dc.titleThe Problem of Language in Thomas Kuhn: Aristotelian Physics and Hermeneutics
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/670433
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN