Assessing the feasibility of blockchain technology in industries: evidence from Turkey

MakaleYalnız künye
  • SDG 9 · Sanayi, Yenilikçilik ve Altyapı

Özet

Purpose The objective of this study is to assess quantitatively how feasible blockchain is for various industries, such as logistics and supply chain, health, energy, finance, automotive, pharmaceutical and agriculture and food using a comprehensive list of indicators. Design/methodology/approach A decision aid was applied to the problem of identifying the feasibility of blockchain in Turkish industries. To this end, first, a set of indicators was identified. Then, the fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS were utilized to assess the feasibility comparatively using the data gathered from a group of experts. Finally, a scenario analysis was conducted to ensure the consistency of our evaluation. Findings The findings of this study suggest that comparatively, logistics and supply chain, finance and health industries are the most feasible industries for blockchain. This study further suggests that blockchain is the least feasible for the automotive industry compared to the rest of the identified industries. Research limitations/implications It is cumbersome to find out the respondents who have sufficient knowledge of both blockchain and the identified industries. Even if we took the utmost care in identifying the right respondents, we limited our search to the biggest industrial hubs of Turkey. Practical implications The findings of this research may help various decision-makers employed in governments, conglomerates, software and consulting firms and national research institutions make more informed decisions and allocate their resources more effectively. Originality/value To this date, the current studies have solely investigated possible research opportunities in blockchain and demonstrated several blockchain applications in stand-alone cases. To the best of our knowledge, however, no single study exists that evaluates the feasibility of blockchain comparatively and holistically among a group of industries using various indicators.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15850Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-09-2019-0309Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorErol, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorAr, Ilker Murat
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ali Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorPeker, Iskender
dc.contributor.authorAsgary, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMedeni, Ihsan Tolga
dc.contributor.authorMedeni, Tunc
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:26:08.624578216Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:26:08.624578216Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.description.abstractPurpose The objective of this study is to assess quantitatively how feasible blockchain is for various industries, such as logistics and supply chain, health, energy, finance, automotive, pharmaceutical and agriculture and food using a comprehensive list of indicators. Design/methodology/approach A decision aid was applied to the problem of identifying the feasibility of blockchain in Turkish industries. To this end, first, a set of indicators was identified. Then, the fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS were utilized to assess the feasibility comparatively using the data gathered from a group of experts. Finally, a scenario analysis was conducted to ensure the consistency of our evaluation. Findings The findings of this study suggest that comparatively, logistics and supply chain, finance and health industries are the most feasible industries for blockchain. This study further suggests that blockchain is the least feasible for the automotive industry compared to the rest of the identified industries. Research limitations/implications It is cumbersome to find out the respondents who have sufficient knowledge of both blockchain and the identified industries. Even if we took the utmost care in identifying the right respondents, we limited our search to the biggest industrial hubs of Turkey. Practical implications The findings of this research may help various decision-makers employed in governments, conglomerates, software and consulting firms and national research institutions make more informed decisions and allocate their resources more effectively. Originality/value To this date, the current studies have solely investigated possible research opportunities in blockchain and demonstrated several blockchain applications in stand-alone cases. To the best of our knowledge, however, no single study exists that evaluates the feasibility of blockchain comparatively and holistically among a group of industries using various indicators.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/jeim-09-2019-0309
dc.identifier.eissn1758-7409
dc.identifier.endpage769
dc.identifier.issn1741-0398
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage746
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15850
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000536338600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBlockchain
dc.subjectIndustries
dc.subjectBlockchain feasibility assessment
dc.subjectDecision aid
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
dc.subject.classificationInformation Science & Library Science
dc.subject.classificationManagement
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science
dc.subject.classificationBusiness & Economics
dc.subject.otherSUPPLY CHAIN
dc.subject.otherFUZZY-AHP
dc.subject.otherRESEARCH FRAMEWORK
dc.subject.otherINFORMATION
dc.subject.otherADOPTION
dc.subject.otherPOWER
dc.subject.otherCHALLENGES
dc.subject.otherMANAGEMENT
dc.subject.otherLOGISTICS
dc.subject.otherKNOWLEDGE
dc.titleAssessing the feasibility of blockchain technology in industries: evidence from Turkey
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex97
rdl.citation.wos71
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.sdgSDG09
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)