Assessment of Türkiye's Healthcare Quality Standards Using the FUCOM Method: FUCOM Method
Özet
This study aims to determine the importance ranking of healthcare quality standards in Türkiye. The latest version of the Healthcare Quality Standards-Hospital (Version 6.1) was used as the healthcare quality standards in Türkiye. The FUCOM method, one of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, was employed to rank the importance of these standards. To use this method, a questionnaire based on the healthcare quality standards was filled out by six experts. The data obtained from the questionnaire were transferred to Microsoft Excel Solver, and the FUCOM method was used with this program. Using the FUCOM method, the local importance weights of the main criteria and sub-criteria were initially determined. Then, the criteria were ranked based on these weights. Subsequently, after determining the global importance weights of the sub-criteria considering the local importance weights of both the main criteria and sub-criteria, their rankings were also established based on these weights.
- Scopus
- 0
- OpenAlex
- 0
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bolayir, Banu | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-22T10:22:30.857040217Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-22T10:22:30.857040217Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to determine the importance ranking of healthcare quality standards in Türkiye. The latest version of the Healthcare Quality Standards-Hospital (Version 6.1) was used as the healthcare quality standards in Türkiye. The FUCOM method, one of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, was employed to rank the importance of these standards. To use this method, a questionnaire based on the healthcare quality standards was filled out by six experts. The data obtained from the questionnaire were transferred to Microsoft Excel Solver, and the FUCOM method was used with this program. Using the FUCOM method, the local importance weights of the main criteria and sub-criteria were initially determined. Then, the criteria were ranked based on these weights. Subsequently, after determining the global importance weights of the sub-criteria considering the local importance weights of both the main criteria and sub-criteria, their rankings were also established based on these weights. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4018/979-8-3693-8789-4.ch008 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 272 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 979-836938791-7 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 979-836938789-4 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105020658573 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 241 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14285 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | IGI Global | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Sustainable Applications in the Digital Age | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject.other | Data quality | |
| dc.subject.other | Health care | |
| dc.subject.other | Quality control | |
| dc.subject.other | Excel's solver | |
| dc.subject.other | Healthcare quality | |
| dc.subject.other | Importance weights | |
| dc.subject.other | Microsoft excel | |
| dc.subject.other | Multicriteria decision making methods | |
| dc.subject.other | Quality standard | |
| dc.subject.other | Decision making | |
| dc.title | Assessment of Türkiye's Healthcare Quality Standards Using the FUCOM Method: FUCOM Method | |
| dc.type | Book Chapter | |
| rdl.citation.openalex | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.oa.status | closed | |
| rdl.sdg | SDG03 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS |

