A quantıtatıve assessment of selected potentıal geosıtes from gümüşhane (türkiye) for the development of geotourısm

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 11 · Sürdürülebilir Şehirler ve Topluluklar

Özet

This study aims to propose an MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model) framework for evaluating seven geosites selected from Gümüşhane (Türkiye). For this purpose, seven geosites to be assessed according to the geosite evaluation criterion introduced by Brilha (2016) were analysed with MEREC-based TOPSIS and EDAS techniques, which are MCDM approaches. According to the results, the most important criteria in the field have been representativeness (SV1), safety (PEU4 and PTU4), and legal protection (DR3). Besides the most important geosites were Karaca Cave and Tomara Waterfall. It is thought that the methodology proposed in the study and the findings obtained will provide a theoretical basis for the subject literature. It is also believed that the results may provide insight into developing practical implications for local stakeholders regarding planning and management

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/20158Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29228/joh.71660Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDede, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorZorlu, Kuttusi
dc.contributor.authorEraslan, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:52:57.366469079Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:52:57.366469079Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to propose an MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model) framework for evaluating seven geosites selected from Gümüşhane (Türkiye). For this purpose, seven geosites to be assessed according to the geosite evaluation criterion introduced by Brilha (2016) were analysed with MEREC-based TOPSIS and EDAS techniques, which are MCDM approaches. According to the results, the most important criteria in the field have been representativeness (SV1), safety (PEU4 and PTU4), and legal protection (DR3). Besides the most important geosites were Karaca Cave and Tomara Waterfall. It is thought that the methodology proposed in the study and the findings obtained will provide a theoretical basis for the subject literature. It is also believed that the results may provide insight into developing practical implications for local stakeholders regarding planning and management
dc.identifier.doi10.29228/joh.71660
dc.identifier.eissn2148-4260
dc.identifier.endpage3106
dc.identifier.issn1308-5298
dc.identifier.issue66
dc.identifier.startpage3082
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/20158
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTarih Okulu Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOtelcilik, Konaklama, Spor ve Turizm
dc.subjectOrtaçağ ve Rönesans Çalışmaları
dc.subjectCoğrafya
dc.titleA quantıtatıve assessment of selected potentıal geosıtes from gümüşhane (türkiye) for the development of geotourısm
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.oa.statusbronze
rdl.oa.urlhttps://johschool.com/files/tarih_okulu/c579a413-a992-4c16-9f97-c8d46c805054.pdf
rdl.sdgSDG11
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN