Antibacterial efficacy of pyrolysis-derived plant fractions against resistant pathogens: a comparative evaluation using nutrient and Müller–Hinton agar

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the antibacterial potential of pyrolysis-derived extracts from rosehip fruit (RF), orange peel (OP), corn silk (CS), spurge root (ER) and mullein leaf (ML) against antibiotic-resistant pathogens using two different culture media. Bioactive compounds were obtained via a PID-controlled pyrolysis system, and antibacterial activity was evaluated to clarify both extract efficacy and medium-dependent effects on bacterial growth and diffusion. RESULTS: Antibacterial activities were assessed using the agar well diffusion method, with ampicillin as a positive control, against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. A key novelty of this work is the comparative evaluation of extract performance on nutrient agar (NA) and Müller–Hinton agar (MHA). Among all samples, the ML extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity across all tested strains, producing inhibition zones of 18.85 mm against E. coli and 17.15 mm against E. faecalis on NA, compared with 13.05 mm and 13.60 mm on MHA, respectively. CS and ER extracts showed moderate antibacterial effects, with consistently higher inhibition zones on NA than on MHA. Ampicillin generated substantially larger inhibition zones on NA (33.35 mm for E. coli and 34.45 mm for P. aeruginosa) compared with MHA (13.80 and 27.70 mm, respectively), confirming the strong influence of culture medium composition on measurable antibacterial activity. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that both plant extracts and ampicillin exhibit higher antibacterial activity on NA than on MHA. The pronounced efficacy of the ML extract highlights pyrolysis-derived plant fractions as promising natural antimicrobials and emphasizes the critical importance of culture medium selection.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13630Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.70455Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Maruf Hurşit
dc.contributor.authorGül, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorAydoğmuş, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorÖzgen, İnanç
dc.contributor.authorArslanoğlu, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:35.687537863Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:35.687537863Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This study investigates the antibacterial potential of pyrolysis-derived extracts from rosehip fruit (RF), orange peel (OP), corn silk (CS), spurge root (ER) and mullein leaf (ML) against antibiotic-resistant pathogens using two different culture media. Bioactive compounds were obtained via a PID-controlled pyrolysis system, and antibacterial activity was evaluated to clarify both extract efficacy and medium-dependent effects on bacterial growth and diffusion. RESULTS: Antibacterial activities were assessed using the agar well diffusion method, with ampicillin as a positive control, against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. A key novelty of this work is the comparative evaluation of extract performance on nutrient agar (NA) and Müller–Hinton agar (MHA). Among all samples, the ML extract exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity across all tested strains, producing inhibition zones of 18.85 mm against E. coli and 17.15 mm against E. faecalis on NA, compared with 13.05 mm and 13.60 mm on MHA, respectively. CS and ER extracts showed moderate antibacterial effects, with consistently higher inhibition zones on NA than on MHA. Ampicillin generated substantially larger inhibition zones on NA (33.35 mm for E. coli and 34.45 mm for P. aeruginosa) compared with MHA (13.80 and 27.70 mm, respectively), confirming the strong influence of culture medium composition on measurable antibacterial activity. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that both plant extracts and ampicillin exhibit higher antibacterial activity on NA than on MHA. The pronounced efficacy of the ML extract highlights pyrolysis-derived plant fractions as promising natural antimicrobials and emphasizes the critical importance of culture medium selection.
dc.description.sponsorshipFirat Üniversitesi, FU, (ADEP.25.07)
dc.description.sponsorshipFirat Üniversitesi, FU
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jsfa.70455
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0010
dc.identifier.endpage3624
dc.identifier.issn0022-5142
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid41532387
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105027785307
dc.identifier.startpage3614
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13630
dc.identifier.volume106
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001661121600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectantibacterial activity
dc.subjectantibiotic-resistant pathogens
dc.subjectbioactive compounds
dc.subjectMüller–Hinton agar
dc.subjectnutrient agar
dc.subjectpyrolysis-derived extracts
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationChemistry, Applied
dc.subject.classificationFood Science & Technology
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture
dc.subject.classificationChemistry
dc.subject.otherAgar
dc.subject.otherAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.subject.otherBacteria
dc.subject.otherCitrus sinensis
dc.subject.otherCulture Media
dc.subject.otherEnterococcus faecalis
dc.subject.otherEscherichia coli
dc.subject.otherFruit
dc.subject.otherMicrobial Sensitivity Tests
dc.subject.otherPlant Extracts
dc.subject.otherPlant Leaves
dc.subject.otherPlant Roots
dc.subject.otherPseudomonas aeruginosa
dc.subject.otherRosa
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcus aureus
dc.subject.otherZea mays
dc.subject.otherantiinfective agent
dc.subject.otherplant extract
dc.subject.otherbacterium
dc.subject.otherchemistry
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherculture medium
dc.subject.otherdrug effect
dc.subject.othergrowth, development and aging
dc.subject.otherisolation and purification
dc.subject.othermaize
dc.subject.othermicrobial sensitivity test
dc.subject.otherplant leaf
dc.subject.otherplant root
dc.subject.otherrose
dc.subject.othersweet orange
dc.titleAntibacterial efficacy of pyrolysis-derived plant fractions against resistant pathogens: a comparative evaluation using nutrient and Müller–Hinton agar
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex5
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.wos5
rdl.departmentDepartment of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gümüşhane University, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/59931
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)