Health sciences students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence: predictors of ethical awareness, clinical decision-making, and public health perceptions-a cross-sectional study

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

This study investigates health sciences students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and the implications for ethical awareness, clinical decision-making, and public health. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between April 27 and May 15 2025, with 668 students from five departments at Gümüşhane University, employing the validated Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale, which measures benefits, risks, and use, alongside 12 binary-response items assessing ethical, clinical, and public health judgments. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses were applied. Findings indicate that students perceive AI as highly beneficial (M = 4.05) but also associate it with notable risks (M = 2.52; where lower scores indicate a higher level of perceived risk due to reverse coding). Logistic regression analyses revealed that risk perception (reverse-coded; higher scores indicating lower perceived risk) was the most consistent predictor across all dimensions. Specifically, students with lower perceived risk were significantly more likely to reject concerns regarding patient privacy (OR = 2.55, 95% CI [2.03–3.21], p < 0.001), dismiss the idea that relying on AI instead of human expertise is problematic (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.25–1.96], p < 0.001), and reject the notion that AI systems may harm public health (OR = 2.52, 95% CI [1.98–3.20], p < 0.001). While participants endorsed AI’s potential in enhancing patient safety, chronic disease management, and preventive care, they expressed significant concerns about privacy, legal responsibility, and a potential weakening of patient–clinician communication. Gender, academic discipline, and prior AI use further differentiated attitudes. The results highlight a dual perception of AI as both an opportunity and a threat, emphasizing that successful integration in healthcare requires not only technical competence but also ethical, legal, and communicative safeguards.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13569Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08707-9Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Atıflar
Scopus
1
WoS
1
OpenAlex
2
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:31.337283565Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:31.337283565Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates health sciences students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and the implications for ethical awareness, clinical decision-making, and public health. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between April 27 and May 15 2025, with 668 students from five departments at Gümüşhane University, employing the validated Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale, which measures benefits, risks, and use, alongside 12 binary-response items assessing ethical, clinical, and public health judgments. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses were applied. Findings indicate that students perceive AI as highly beneficial (M = 4.05) but also associate it with notable risks (M = 2.52; where lower scores indicate a higher level of perceived risk due to reverse coding). Logistic regression analyses revealed that risk perception (reverse-coded; higher scores indicating lower perceived risk) was the most consistent predictor across all dimensions. Specifically, students with lower perceived risk were significantly more likely to reject concerns regarding patient privacy (OR = 2.55, 95% CI [2.03–3.21], p < 0.001), dismiss the idea that relying on AI instead of human expertise is problematic (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.25–1.96], p < 0.001), and reject the notion that AI systems may harm public health (OR = 2.52, 95% CI [1.98–3.20], p < 0.001). While participants endorsed AI’s potential in enhancing patient safety, chronic disease management, and preventive care, they expressed significant concerns about privacy, legal responsibility, and a potential weakening of patient–clinician communication. Gender, academic discipline, and prior AI use further differentiated attitudes. The results highlight a dual perception of AI as both an opportunity and a threat, emphasizing that successful integration in healthcare requires not only technical competence but also ethical, legal, and communicative safeguards.
dc.identifier.articlenumber358
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-026-08707-9
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6920
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid41620691
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105031562932
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13569
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001705127400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Education
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectClinical Decision-Making
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectHealth sciences students
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subject.classificationEducation & Educational Research
dc.subject.classificationEducation, Scientific Disciplines
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherArtificial Intelligence
dc.subject.otherAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject.otherClinical Decision-Making
dc.subject.otherCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherPublic Health
dc.subject.otherStudents, Health Occupations
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.otherYoung Adult
dc.subject.otherclinical decision making
dc.subject.othercross-sectional study
dc.subject.otherethics
dc.subject.otherhealth personnel attitude
dc.subject.otherhealth student
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherpsychology
dc.subject.otherquestionnaire
dc.titleHealth sciences students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence: predictors of ethical awareness, clinical decision-making, and public health perceptions-a cross-sectional study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentDepartment of Healthcare Management, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08707-9
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)