Estimating the number of clusters in a dataset via consensus clustering

MakaleYalnız künye

Özet

In unsupervised learning, the problem of finding the appropriate number of clusters -usually notated as k- is very challenging. Its importance lies in the fact that k is a vital hyperparameter for the most clustering algorithms. One algorithmic approach for tacking this problem is to apply a certain clustering algorithm with various cluster configurations and decide to use the one that maximizes a certain internal validity measure. This is a promising and computationally efficient approach since the independent runs are parallelizable. In this paper, we attempt to improve over this estimation approach by incorporating a consensus clustering approach into k estimating scheme. The weighted consensus clustering scheme employs four different indices namely Silhouette (SH), Calinski–Harabasz (CH), Davies–Bouldin (DB), and Consensus (CI) indices to estimate the correct number of cluster. Computational experiments in a dataset with clusters ranging from 2 to 7 show the profound advantages of weighted consensus clustering for correctly finding k in comparison to individual clustering method (e.g, k-means) and simple consensus clustering.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13354Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.074Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorXanthopoulos, Petros
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:15.078504910Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:15.078504910Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn unsupervised learning, the problem of finding the appropriate number of clusters -usually notated as k- is very challenging. Its importance lies in the fact that k is a vital hyperparameter for the most clustering algorithms. One algorithmic approach for tacking this problem is to apply a certain clustering algorithm with various cluster configurations and decide to use the one that maximizes a certain internal validity measure. This is a promising and computationally efficient approach since the independent runs are parallelizable. In this paper, we attempt to improve over this estimation approach by incorporating a consensus clustering approach into k estimating scheme. The weighted consensus clustering scheme employs four different indices namely Silhouette (SH), Calinski–Harabasz (CH), Davies–Bouldin (DB), and Consensus (CI) indices to estimate the correct number of cluster. Computational experiments in a dataset with clusters ranging from 2 to 7 show the profound advantages of weighted consensus clustering for correctly finding k in comparison to individual clustering method (e.g, k-means) and simple consensus clustering.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.074
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6793
dc.identifier.endpage39
dc.identifier.issn0957-4174
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060907314
dc.identifier.startpage33
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13354
dc.identifier.volume125
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000463121100003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofExpert Systems with Applications
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectNumber of clusters
dc.subjectValidity indices
dc.subjectWeighted consensus clustering
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science, Artificial Intelligence
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Electrical & Electronic
dc.subject.classificationOperations Research & Management Science
dc.subject.classificationComputer Science
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.otherCluster analysis
dc.subject.otherAlgorithmic approach
dc.subject.otherCluster configurations
dc.subject.otherComputational experiment
dc.subject.otherComputationally efficient
dc.subject.otherConsensus clustering
dc.subject.otherEstimation approaches
dc.subject.otherNumber of clusters
dc.subject.otherValidity index
dc.subject.otherK-means clustering
dc.titleEstimating the number of clusters in a dataset via consensus clustering
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex139
rdl.citation.scopus136
rdl.citation.wos111
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)