Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism
Özet
Having looked at history of political opinion, in addition to pilosophers who is defender popular political paradigm of that period, there are philosophers who objects to that view trying to suggest alternative theory. The first half of 20th century Carl Schmitt is one of thinkers criticising radically to political view widespried in Europa. Undoubtedly, he criticises mainly parliamentary democracy, pluralistic and liberal theories. In this paper, his criticisms raised againist liberal political theories are discussed in the context of why and how questions He, with reference to political formation in that period, believes that pluralistic and liberal theories were to blame for politic/social problems. He does not ignore apply to philosophical justification frequently keeping in mind history of philosopyh in his criticisms. His primary sources of inspiration are political philosophies of Hobbes and Hegel. In addition to this, problematic relationship between Schmitt and national socialism is dealt with in that paper.
Anahtar Kelimeler
- TR Dizin
- 0
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Yeşilçayır, Celal | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-22T10:45:33.520648944Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-22T10:45:33.520648944Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Having looked at history of political opinion, in addition to pilosophers who is defender popular political paradigm of that period, there are philosophers who objects to that view trying to suggest alternative theory. The first half of 20th century Carl Schmitt is one of thinkers criticising radically to political view widespried in Europa. Undoubtedly, he criticises mainly parliamentary democracy, pluralistic and liberal theories. In this paper, his criticisms raised againist liberal political theories are discussed in the context of why and how questions He, with reference to political formation in that period, believes that pluralistic and liberal theories were to blame for politic/social problems. He does not ignore apply to philosophical justification frequently keeping in mind history of philosopyh in his criticisms. His primary sources of inspiration are political philosophies of Hobbes and Hegel. In addition to this, problematic relationship between Schmitt and national socialism is dealt with in that paper. | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2148-5232 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 22 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/18644 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 5 | |
| dc.language.iso | tr | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Mavi Atlas | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Siyasi Bilimler | |
| dc.subject | Felsefe | |
| dc.title | Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| rdl.citation.trdizin | 0 | |
| rdl.source.index | TRDIZIN |

