The Art of Dialectic (Jadal) in Ibn al-Mutahhar al-Hillī

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Al-Hilli, known as a Shii theologian and legal theorist, was a versatile scholar of the thirteenth century who authored numerous works on the philosophical sciences. In his writings, al-Hilli carefully examined ontological problems and methodological questions, systematically discussed the problem of knowledge, and devoted considerable attention to the science of logic. This article addresses al-Hilli's views on the art of dialectic (jadal), which he considered necessary for those who have not yet attained the level of demonstration (burhan), which ranks second in importance among the five arts, and on which no dedicated study has hitherto been undertaken. The aim of the article is to determine, on the basis of his logic works composed within the Peripatetic (Mash'sha'i) tradition, the extent to which al-Hilli was influenced by earlier logicians in his understanding of jadal and the respects in which he diverged from them. The scope of the article is confined to three of al-Hilli's works: his commentary on the logic section of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi's Tajrid al-i'tiqad, entitled al-Jawhar al-nadid; his commentary on al-Katibi's logical treatise al-Shamsiyya, entitled al-Qawa'id al-jaliyya; and his independent composition al-Asrar al-khafiyya fi al-'ul & umacr;m al-'aqliyya. These works were examined through a single-subject scanning method, whereby passages containing data pertaining to the components of dialectical theory-including its definition, premises, structure, and application-were identified and analysed. In this context, recourse was made to the works of logicians who had written on jadal prior to al-Hilli, among them Aristotle, al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, al-T & umacr;si, and al-Katibi, with particular attention given to a comparative analysis of the explanations offered by Ibn Sina and al-Hilli. It was ultimately established that al-Hilli followed both the Aristotelian and the Peripatetic logical tradition in his theory of jadal, and that he was especially influenced by Ibn Sina.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/16085Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35415/sirnakifd.1853352Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorEvmes, Adem
dc.contributor.authorAkbay, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.authorAkyüz, Turgut
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:26:24.410584930Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:26:24.410584930Z
dc.date.issued2026-06
dc.description.abstractAl-Hilli, known as a Shii theologian and legal theorist, was a versatile scholar of the thirteenth century who authored numerous works on the philosophical sciences. In his writings, al-Hilli carefully examined ontological problems and methodological questions, systematically discussed the problem of knowledge, and devoted considerable attention to the science of logic. This article addresses al-Hilli's views on the art of dialectic (jadal), which he considered necessary for those who have not yet attained the level of demonstration (burhan), which ranks second in importance among the five arts, and on which no dedicated study has hitherto been undertaken. The aim of the article is to determine, on the basis of his logic works composed within the Peripatetic (Mash'sha'i) tradition, the extent to which al-Hilli was influenced by earlier logicians in his understanding of jadal and the respects in which he diverged from them. The scope of the article is confined to three of al-Hilli's works: his commentary on the logic section of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi's Tajrid al-i'tiqad, entitled al-Jawhar al-nadid; his commentary on al-Katibi's logical treatise al-Shamsiyya, entitled al-Qawa'id al-jaliyya; and his independent composition al-Asrar al-khafiyya fi al-'ul & umacr;m al-'aqliyya. These works were examined through a single-subject scanning method, whereby passages containing data pertaining to the components of dialectical theory-including its definition, premises, structure, and application-were identified and analysed. In this context, recourse was made to the works of logicians who had written on jadal prior to al-Hilli, among them Aristotle, al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, al-T & umacr;si, and al-Katibi, with particular attention given to a comparative analysis of the explanations offered by Ibn Sina and al-Hilli. It was ultimately established that al-Hilli followed both the Aristotelian and the Peripatetic logical tradition in his theory of jadal, and that he was especially influenced by Ibn Sina.
dc.identifier.doi10.35415/sirnakifd.1853352
dc.identifier.eissn2667-6575
dc.identifier.endpage398
dc.identifier.issn2146-4901
dc.identifier.issue39
dc.identifier.startpage372
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/16085
dc.identifier.volume0
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001817660200011
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherSirnak Univ
dc.relation.ispartofSIRNAK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DIVINITY FACULTY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLogic
dc.subjectthe Art of Dialectic
dc.subjectDebate
dc.subjectQuestion-Answer
dc.subjectIbn al-Mutahhar al-Hill & imacr
dc.subject.classificationReligion
dc.titleThe Art of Dialectic (Jadal) in Ibn al-Mutahhar al-Hillī
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/5557900
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)