Competitive positioning of winter tourism destinations: A comparative analysis of demand and supply sides perspectives–Cases from Turkey

MakaleYalnız künye

Özet

This study was conducted to determine the competitive positions of five winter tourism destinations in Turkey. The explanatory sequential mixed method was used in order to compare the views of both the supply and demand sides. A questionnaire was first applied to current and potential visitors of the related destinations (n = 417), both in the field and online, followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with destination stakeholders (n = 12). It was observed that visitor perceptions positioned Uludağ with its tourism superstructure means and entertainment opportunities, Kartalkaya with its tourism superstructure quality and service quality, Erciyes, with its reasonable pricing policy and uncrowded slopes/lifts, Palandöken with its adequate number of lifts and snow quality, and Kartepe, with its beautiful scenery and accessibility. The assessments of the destination stakeholders demonstrated that strategies for strengthening the current position was not accepted at every destination and that only some destination stakeholders were inclined toward repositioning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14989Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.009Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorEvren, Savaş
dc.contributor.authorKozak, Nazmi
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:23:25.536428480Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:23:25.536428480Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to determine the competitive positions of five winter tourism destinations in Turkey. The explanatory sequential mixed method was used in order to compare the views of both the supply and demand sides. A questionnaire was first applied to current and potential visitors of the related destinations (n = 417), both in the field and online, followed by semi-structured interviews conducted with destination stakeholders (n = 12). It was observed that visitor perceptions positioned Uludağ with its tourism superstructure means and entertainment opportunities, Kartalkaya with its tourism superstructure quality and service quality, Erciyes, with its reasonable pricing policy and uncrowded slopes/lifts, Palandöken with its adequate number of lifts and snow quality, and Kartepe, with its beautiful scenery and accessibility. The assessments of the destination stakeholders demonstrated that strategies for strengthening the current position was not accepted at every destination and that only some destination stakeholders were inclined toward repositioning.
dc.description.sponsorshipAnadolu University Scientific Research Projects Commission
dc.description.sponsorshipFirat University Scientific Research Projects Management Unit, FÜBAP, (1305E098)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.009
dc.identifier.eissn2212-5752
dc.identifier.endpage257
dc.identifier.issn2212-571X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85041915144
dc.identifier.startpage247
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14989
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000436916300023
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Destination Marketing and Management
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCompetitive positioning
dc.subjectDemand side
dc.subjectSupply side
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectWinter tourism
dc.subject.classificationHospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism
dc.subject.classificationManagement
dc.subject.classificationSocial Sciences - Other Topics
dc.subject.classificationBusiness & Economics
dc.subject.otherCONVENTION CITIES
dc.titleCompetitive positioning of winter tourism destinations: A comparative analysis of demand and supply sides perspectives–Cases from Turkey
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex55
rdl.citation.scopus42
rdl.citation.wos37
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)