Rethinking sexual response: are erogenous zones—including nipple stimulation—more than secondary stimuli? A meta-analysis

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Objectives: The nipple, a key erogenous zone in female sexual response, is often insufficiently considered in clinical practice, and scientific studies on nipple stimulation are limited. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of nipple stimulation on sexual response and sexual satisfaction in young women. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were identified through a search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases without any year restrictions. Results: A total of nine studies (~1276 participants) were included in the systematic review. Of these, six studies (390 intervention, 441 control; n = 831) contributed to the meta-analysis of sexual response/orgasm outcomes, and six studies (655 intervention, 621 control; n = 1276) contributed to the meta-analysis of sexual satisfaction. Nipple stimulation significantly improved sexual response [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.51, P < .00001] and sexual satisfaction (SMD = 0.59, P = .005). Discussion: Nipple stimulation may be used as a supportive method to enhance sexual function and sexual satisfaction in young women. It may be considered as a complementary approach to sexual counseling and therapy, particularly for women experiencing sexual aversion, difficulty with arousal, and orgasm problems. This meta-analysis suggests that nipple stimulation may have a moderate positive effect on sexual response and sexual satisfaction in young women; however, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited age range of the included population and the heterogeneity across studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13818Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfag065Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYildiz Karaahmet, Aysu
dc.contributor.authorKarakas, Sevda
dc.contributor.authorBilgic, Fatma Sule
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:49.647518598Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:49.647518598Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The nipple, a key erogenous zone in female sexual response, is often insufficiently considered in clinical practice, and scientific studies on nipple stimulation are limited. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of nipple stimulation on sexual response and sexual satisfaction in young women. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were identified through a search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases without any year restrictions. Results: A total of nine studies (~1276 participants) were included in the systematic review. Of these, six studies (390 intervention, 441 control; n = 831) contributed to the meta-analysis of sexual response/orgasm outcomes, and six studies (655 intervention, 621 control; n = 1276) contributed to the meta-analysis of sexual satisfaction. Nipple stimulation significantly improved sexual response [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.51, P < .00001] and sexual satisfaction (SMD = 0.59, P = .005). Discussion: Nipple stimulation may be used as a supportive method to enhance sexual function and sexual satisfaction in young women. It may be considered as a complementary approach to sexual counseling and therapy, particularly for women experiencing sexual aversion, difficulty with arousal, and orgasm problems. This meta-analysis suggests that nipple stimulation may have a moderate positive effect on sexual response and sexual satisfaction in young women; however, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited age range of the included population and the heterogeneity across studies.
dc.identifier.articlenumberqfag065
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/sexmed/qfag065
dc.identifier.eissn2050-1161
dc.identifier.issn2050-1161
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid42609841
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105047985939
dc.identifier.startpageqfag065
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13818
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001851007700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofSexual Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecterogenous zones
dc.subjectnipple stimulation
dc.subjectorgasm
dc.subjectsexuality
dc.subject.classificationMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subject.classificationUrology & Nephrology
dc.subject.classificationGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherclinical outcome
dc.subject.otherfemale
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.othermale
dc.subject.othermeta analysis
dc.subject.othernipple
dc.subject.otherorgasm
dc.subject.othersexual behavior
dc.subject.othersexual satisfaction
dc.subject.otherstimulation
dc.subject.othersystematic review
dc.titleRethinking sexual response: are erogenous zones—including nipple stimulation—more than secondary stimuli? A meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Gumushane University, Gumushane, 29100, Turkey
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfag065
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)