A Policy-Aligned Integrated Index Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment Monitoring and Reporting Using the Best Worst Method

Kitap BölümüYalnız künye
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi

Özet

Environmental Impact Assessment generates growing volumes of monitoring data, yet reporting still tends to treat indicators as separate signals rather than parts of a coherent evaluative structure. This chapter responds to that gap by developing a policy-aligned integrated index for monitoring and reporting in EIA. The proposed framework links environmental indicators to ESG themes, SDG targets, and European Green Deal priorities, then uses the Best Worst Method to derive transparent and defensible weights. Rather than presenting the index as a substitute for detailed evidence, the chapter treats it as a structured synthesis that can clarify how monitoring results relate to policy commitments and reporting needs. An illustrative application shows how the framework can organise indicators, support interpretation, and remain sensitive to alternative weighting choices. The chapter concludes by outlining the practical value and limits of using integrated indices in EIA contexts.

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13749Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorŞimşek, Aybala
dc.contributor.authorŞimşek, Ahmet Bahadır
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:43.899006429Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:43.899006429Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental Impact Assessment generates growing volumes of monitoring data, yet reporting still tends to treat indicators as separate signals rather than parts of a coherent evaluative structure. This chapter responds to that gap by developing a policy-aligned integrated index for monitoring and reporting in EIA. The proposed framework links environmental indicators to ESG themes, SDG targets, and European Green Deal priorities, then uses the Best Worst Method to derive transparent and defensible weights. Rather than presenting the index as a substitute for detailed evidence, the chapter treats it as a structured synthesis that can clarify how monitoring results relate to policy commitments and reporting needs. An illustrative application shows how the framework can organise indicators, support interpretation, and remain sensitive to alternative weighting choices. The chapter concludes by outlining the practical value and limits of using integrated indices in EIA contexts.
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/979-8-3373-9018-5.ch005
dc.identifier.endpage136
dc.identifier.isbn979-833739020-8
dc.identifier.isbn979-833739018-5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105048928574
dc.identifier.startpage111
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13749
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIGI Global
dc.relation.ispartofIntegrated and Smart Sustainability Indicators for Environmental Impact Evaluation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental monitoring
dc.subject.otherBAD methods
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental indicators
dc.subject.otherImpact assessments
dc.subject.otherMonitoring results
dc.subject.otherEnvironmental impact assessments
dc.titleA Policy-Aligned Integrated Index Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment Monitoring and Reporting Using the Best Worst Method
dc.typeBook Chapter
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS