Immediate effects of cervical spine and sacroiliac joint manipulations on the autonomic nervous system and pedobarographic analysis: Randomized controlled trial

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Background: This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of cervical and sacroiliac joint manipulations on autonomic nervous system activity and baropodometric parameters. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to three groups with equal gender distribution. The cervical manipulation group received chiropractic manipulation at the C3–C5 level, while the sacroiliac group received manipulation at the sacroiliac joint. The control group received no intervention. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were conducted after a 30-minute interval. Plantar pressure was measured via a pedobarographic device. Autonomic nervous system activity was assessed using the Polar H10. Blood pressure and heart rate were manually recorded using a sphygmomanometer and pulse oximeter. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: No significant differences were found among groups in terms of age, gender, height, or BMI (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05). The cervical manipulation group showed significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate post-intervention (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). The sacroiliac group showed a significant increase in heart rate only (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in baropodometric parameters or autonomic activity within or between groups (Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05). However, post-intervention comparisons showed cervical manipulation led to a greater reduction in systolic blood pressure, while sacroiliac manipulation led to a greater increase in heart rate compared to controls (Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05). Conclusion: While no significant changes were observed in baropodometric or autonomic parameters, chiropractic manipulation demonstrated short-term effects on blood pressure and heart rate. The accuracy of heart rate variability assessments should be reviewed, and further studies are needed to evaluate long-term cardiovascular and autonomic outcomes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13452Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2026.100634Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Hayriye
dc.contributor.authorBüyükkırlı, İlker Can
dc.contributor.authorHatık, Sefa Haktan
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Emine Büşra
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:22.576088238Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:22.576088238Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of cervical and sacroiliac joint manipulations on autonomic nervous system activity and baropodometric parameters. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to three groups with equal gender distribution. The cervical manipulation group received chiropractic manipulation at the C3–C5 level, while the sacroiliac group received manipulation at the sacroiliac joint. The control group received no intervention. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were conducted after a 30-minute interval. Plantar pressure was measured via a pedobarographic device. Autonomic nervous system activity was assessed using the Polar H10. Blood pressure and heart rate were manually recorded using a sphygmomanometer and pulse oximeter. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: No significant differences were found among groups in terms of age, gender, height, or BMI (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05). The cervical manipulation group showed significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate post-intervention (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). The sacroiliac group showed a significant increase in heart rate only (Wilcoxon, p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in baropodometric parameters or autonomic activity within or between groups (Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05). However, post-intervention comparisons showed cervical manipulation led to a greater reduction in systolic blood pressure, while sacroiliac manipulation led to a greater increase in heart rate compared to controls (Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05). Conclusion: While no significant changes were observed in baropodometric or autonomic parameters, chiropractic manipulation demonstrated short-term effects on blood pressure and heart rate. The accuracy of heart rate variability assessments should be reviewed, and further studies are needed to evaluate long-term cardiovascular and autonomic outcomes.
dc.identifier.articlenumber100634
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aimed.2026.100634
dc.identifier.eissn2212-9596
dc.identifier.issn2212-9588
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105031713126
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13452
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001709501800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Australia
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Integrative Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAutonomic nervous system
dc.subjectPedobarographic analysis
dc.subjectSpinal manipulation
dc.subject.classificationIntegrative & Complementary Medicine
dc.subject.otheradult
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherautonomic nervous system
dc.subject.otherblood pressure
dc.subject.otherbody mass
dc.subject.othercervical spine
dc.subject.otherclinical trial
dc.subject.othercontrolled study
dc.subject.otherdiastolic blood pressure
dc.subject.otherfemale
dc.subject.otherheart rate variability
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.othermale
dc.subject.otherplantar pressure
dc.subject.otherrandomized controlled trial
dc.subject.othersacroiliac joint
dc.subject.othersystolic blood pressure
dc.titleImmediate effects of cervical spine and sacroiliac joint manipulations on the autonomic nervous system and pedobarographic analysis: Randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.statuspreprint
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/11486/8250
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)