Comparison of tree-based classification algorithms in mapping burned forest areas; [Primerjava drevesnih algoritmov razvrščanja pri zajemu območij pogorelih gozdov]

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 15 · Karasal Yaşam

Özet

In this study, we compared the performance of tree-based classification algorithms – Random Forest (RF), Rotation Forest (RotF), J48, The Alternating Decision Tree (ADTree), Forest by Penalising Attributes (Forest PA), Logical Analysis of Data Algorithm (LADTree) and Functional Trees (FT) – for mapping burned forest areas within the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) was performed to pan-sharpened the Landsat 8 images. Four different burned areas, namely Kumluca, Adrasan, Anamur, and Alanya, were used as study areas. Kumluca, Anamur, and Alanya regions were used as training areas, and Adrasan region was used as the test area. Obtained results were evaluated with confusion matrix and statistically significant analysis. According to the results, FT and RotF produced more accurate results than other algorithms. Also, the results obtained with these algorithms are statistically significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12918Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorMatci, Dilek Kucuk
dc.contributor.authorComert, Resul
dc.contributor.authorAvdan, Ugur
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:20:42.217152677Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:20:42.217152677Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we compared the performance of tree-based classification algorithms – Random Forest (RF), Rotation Forest (RotF), J48, The Alternating Decision Tree (ADTree), Forest by Penalising Attributes (Forest PA), Logical Analysis of Data Algorithm (LADTree) and Functional Trees (FT) – for mapping burned forest areas within the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) was performed to pan-sharpened the Landsat 8 images. Four different burned areas, namely Kumluca, Adrasan, Anamur, and Alanya, were used as study areas. Kumluca, Anamur, and Alanya regions were used as training areas, and Adrasan region was used as the test area. Obtained results were evaluated with confusion matrix and statistically significant analysis. According to the results, FT and RotF produced more accurate results than other algorithms. Also, the results obtained with these algorithms are statistically significant.
dc.identifier.doi10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2020.03.348-360
dc.identifier.eissn1581-1328
dc.identifier.endpage360
dc.identifier.issn0351-0271
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095121743
dc.identifier.startpage348
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12918
dc.identifier.volume64
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000618868800006
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherZvava Geodetov Slovenije
dc.relation.ispartofGeodetski Vestnik
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDupervised vlassification
dc.subjectLandsat
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectRemote sensing
dc.subjectTree-based algorithm
dc.subject.classificationGeography
dc.subject.otherMediterranean Region
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherMeleagris gallopavo
dc.subject.otheraccuracy assessment
dc.subject.otheralgorithm
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherforest fire
dc.subject.otherimage classification
dc.subject.otherLandsat
dc.subject.othermachine learning
dc.subject.otherperformance assessment
dc.subject.otherremote sensing
dc.subject.othersatellite imagery
dc.titleComparison of tree-based classification algorithms in mapping burned forest areas; [Primerjava drevesnih algoritmov razvrščanja pri zajemu območij pogorelih gozdov]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex4
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2020.03.348-360
rdl.sdgSDG15
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)