Comparison of drop table and diversified chiropractic techniques in patients with non-specific neck pain; [Comparação das técnicas quiropráticas drop table e diversified em pacientes com dor cervical inespecífica]

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Introduction: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder associated with pain, reduced cervical mobility, and decreased muscle strength, often leading to functional limitations. Chiropractic manipulation is widely used as a conservative treatment, yet the comparative effects of different techniques remain unclear. ## Objective To compare the effects of the diversified and drop table chiropractic techniques on pain, cervical range of motion, and muscle strength in individuals with non-specific neck pain. ## Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial included 45 participants with non-specific neck pain, randomly assigned to three groups: diversified (DG; n = 15), drop table (DTG; n = 15), and control (CG; n = 15). Interventions were applied twice weekly for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was pain level assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were cervical joint range of motion assessed with a goniometer and isometric neck muscle strength assessed using a microFET2 dynamometer. Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-intervention. ## Results Both DG and DTG demonstrated significant increases in cervical range of motion compared with the CG. Pain levels significantly decreased in both intervention groups. DG showed significant improvements across all isometric muscle strength measures, while DTG demonstrated selective improvements in flexion and right lateral flexion. CG showed no significant changes, except a decrease in extensor strength. ## Conclusion Chiropractic interventions effectively reduce pain and enhance cervical function in individuals with non-specific neck pain. The diversified technique provided broader muscle strength improvements, while the drop table technique showed more selective effects, emphasizing the need for individualized technique selection in clinical practice. Open access and CC-BY licensed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12445Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2026.39119Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKızıltoprak, Dünya Tajik
dc.contributor.authorHatıp, Sefa Haktan
dc.contributor.authorKızıl, Ömer Dicle
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Emine Büşra
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:20:07.513543525Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:20:07.513543525Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder associated with pain, reduced cervical mobility, and decreased muscle strength, often leading to functional limitations. Chiropractic manipulation is widely used as a conservative treatment, yet the comparative effects of different techniques remain unclear. ## Objective To compare the effects of the diversified and drop table chiropractic techniques on pain, cervical range of motion, and muscle strength in individuals with non-specific neck pain. ## Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial included 45 participants with non-specific neck pain, randomly assigned to three groups: diversified (DG; n = 15), drop table (DTG; n = 15), and control (CG; n = 15). Interventions were applied twice weekly for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was pain level assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were cervical joint range of motion assessed with a goniometer and isometric neck muscle strength assessed using a microFET2 dynamometer. Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-intervention. ## Results Both DG and DTG demonstrated significant increases in cervical range of motion compared with the CG. Pain levels significantly decreased in both intervention groups. DG showed significant improvements across all isometric muscle strength measures, while DTG demonstrated selective improvements in flexion and right lateral flexion. CG showed no significant changes, except a decrease in extensor strength. ## Conclusion Chiropractic interventions effectively reduce pain and enhance cervical function in individuals with non-specific neck pain. The diversified technique provided broader muscle strength improvements, while the drop table technique showed more selective effects, emphasizing the need for individualized technique selection in clinical practice. Open access and CC-BY licensed.
dc.identifier.articlenumbere39119
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/fm.2026.39119
dc.identifier.issn1980-5918
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105046351340
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12445
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana
dc.relation.ispartofFisioterapia em Movimento
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectChiropractic
dc.subjectDiversified technique
dc.subjectDrop table technique
dc.subjectMuscle strength
dc.subjectNeck pain
dc.titleComparison of drop table and diversified chiropractic techniques in patients with non-specific neck pain; [Comparação das técnicas quiropráticas drop table e diversified em pacientes com dor cervical inespecífica]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2026.39119
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS