Match success in football: insights from raw and possession-normalized key performance indicators in the Turkish professional league

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Match-performance indicators are widely used to explain success in football; however, traditional analyses based solely on absolute key performance indicators (KPIs) may overlook contextual factors such as ball possession and phase of play. This study aimed to examine match-performance indicators associated with winning in Turkish professional football using two complementary approaches: a raw KPI model based on absolute match actions and a possession- and phase-of-play–normalized KPI model accounting for contextual opportunity. Methodology: Match data were obtained from a validated event-based database covering six consecutive seasons, yielding 2,728 team observations from 1,364 win–loss matches. Descriptive comparisons between winning and losing teams were conducted, followed by multivariate binary logistic regression analyses to identify performance indicators independently associated with match success under both modeling approaches. Results: At the descriptive level, winning teams demonstrated higher values for shots, shots on target, accurate passes, opponent-half accurate passes, accurate crosses (%), and opponent-half accurate passes (%), whereas total possession and total passes did not differ significantly between groups. In terms of disciplinary indicators, losing teams received significantly more yellow and red cards, whereas fouls committed were significantly higher in winning teams (p = 0.014). However, the normalized indicator (fouls committed per out-of-possession) did not differ significantly between groups. In the raw KPI model, positive predictors of match success included shots on target (OR = 1.58), accurate crosses (OR = 1.10), opponent-half accurate passes (OR = 1.01), and fouls committed (OR = 1.04). Negative predictors were total crosses (OR = 0.92), yellow cards (OR = 0.89), and red cards (OR = 0.49). In the possession-normalized model, significant positive predictors were shots on target per possession, accurate crosses per possession, and fouls committed per out-of-possession. Significant negative predictors included crosses per possession, accurate crosses (%), yellow cards per out-of-possession, and red cards per out-of-possession. Conclusions: The findings indicate that combining absolute performance indicators with context-sensitive normalized metrics may provide a more comprehensive perspective on match success in football. Offensive efficiency and disciplinary control emerged as key correlates of winning, particularly when evaluated relative to possession and phase-of-play contexts. These findings suggest the potential value of integrating contextualized performance analysis into match evaluation and performance analysis frameworks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12194Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01768-9Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSever, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorÖncü, Çağdaş
dc.contributor.authorÖztaşyonar, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdaroğlu, Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:19:47.043523399Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:19:47.043523399Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Match-performance indicators are widely used to explain success in football; however, traditional analyses based solely on absolute key performance indicators (KPIs) may overlook contextual factors such as ball possession and phase of play. This study aimed to examine match-performance indicators associated with winning in Turkish professional football using two complementary approaches: a raw KPI model based on absolute match actions and a possession- and phase-of-play–normalized KPI model accounting for contextual opportunity. Methodology: Match data were obtained from a validated event-based database covering six consecutive seasons, yielding 2,728 team observations from 1,364 win–loss matches. Descriptive comparisons between winning and losing teams were conducted, followed by multivariate binary logistic regression analyses to identify performance indicators independently associated with match success under both modeling approaches. Results: At the descriptive level, winning teams demonstrated higher values for shots, shots on target, accurate passes, opponent-half accurate passes, accurate crosses (%), and opponent-half accurate passes (%), whereas total possession and total passes did not differ significantly between groups. In terms of disciplinary indicators, losing teams received significantly more yellow and red cards, whereas fouls committed were significantly higher in winning teams (p = 0.014). However, the normalized indicator (fouls committed per out-of-possession) did not differ significantly between groups. In the raw KPI model, positive predictors of match success included shots on target (OR = 1.58), accurate crosses (OR = 1.10), opponent-half accurate passes (OR = 1.01), and fouls committed (OR = 1.04). Negative predictors were total crosses (OR = 0.92), yellow cards (OR = 0.89), and red cards (OR = 0.49). In the possession-normalized model, significant positive predictors were shots on target per possession, accurate crosses per possession, and fouls committed per out-of-possession. Significant negative predictors included crosses per possession, accurate crosses (%), yellow cards per out-of-possession, and red cards per out-of-possession. Conclusions: The findings indicate that combining absolute performance indicators with context-sensitive normalized metrics may provide a more comprehensive perspective on match success in football. Offensive efficiency and disciplinary control emerged as key correlates of winning, particularly when evaluated relative to possession and phase-of-play contexts. These findings suggest the potential value of integrating contextualized performance analysis into match evaluation and performance analysis frameworks.
dc.identifier.articlenumber340
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-026-01768-9
dc.identifier.issn2052-1847
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid42216227
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105046417923
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12194
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001837404800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectFootball
dc.subjectLogistic regression
dc.subjectMatch analysis
dc.subjectMatch success
dc.subjectPerformance indicators
dc.subjectPossession-based analysis
dc.subject.classificationRehabilitation
dc.subject.classificationSport Sciences
dc.subject.otherarticle
dc.subject.otherbenchmarking
dc.subject.otherdata base
dc.subject.otherfemale
dc.subject.otherfootball
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherkey performance indicator
dc.subject.otherlogistic regression analysis
dc.subject.othermale
dc.subject.otherperformance indicator
dc.titleMatch success in football: insights from raw and possession-normalized key performance indicators in the Turkish professional league
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.departmentDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Gumushane University, Gumushane, 29100, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01768-9
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)