Turkish Adaptation, Psychometric Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of the Nursing Care Scale

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Aim: This study aimed to adapt the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity, reliability and measurement invariance among nurses in Türkiye. Background: Implicit rationing of nursing care may compromise care quality and patient safety and is influenced by organizational, resource-related and communication factors. A culturally valid instrument is needed to identify the factors contributing to implicit rationing of nursing care within the Turkish healthcare context. Design: A methodological, cross-sectional psychometric validation study. Method: Data were collected between July and December 2025 from nurses working in a public hospital in Türkiye. The source population comprised 900 nurses and 411 nurses were included in the final sample using convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form and the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale. Construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on randomly divided samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and gender-based measurement invariance were assessed. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was 0.936, indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure consistent with the original scale, explaining 74.30% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit. Convergent validity was supported, whereas the heterotrait–monotrait ratio value indicated borderline discriminant validity. Measurement invariance across genders was largely supported at the configural, metric and scalar levels. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency and temporal stability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.941, a McDonald's omega value of 0.932 and an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.873. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale is a valid, reliable and gender-invariant instrument. It can be confidently used in Turkish clinical settings to assess factors contributing to implicit rationing of nursing care.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12186Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70186Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÖzalp, Cemal
dc.contributor.authorGerçek, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:19:46.569018553Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:19:46.569018553Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aimed to adapt the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity, reliability and measurement invariance among nurses in Türkiye. Background: Implicit rationing of nursing care may compromise care quality and patient safety and is influenced by organizational, resource-related and communication factors. A culturally valid instrument is needed to identify the factors contributing to implicit rationing of nursing care within the Turkish healthcare context. Design: A methodological, cross-sectional psychometric validation study. Method: Data were collected between July and December 2025 from nurses working in a public hospital in Türkiye. The source population comprised 900 nurses and 411 nurses were included in the final sample using convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form and the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale. Construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on randomly divided samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and gender-based measurement invariance were assessed. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was 0.936, indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure consistent with the original scale, explaining 74.30% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit. Convergent validity was supported, whereas the heterotrait–monotrait ratio value indicated borderline discriminant validity. Measurement invariance across genders was largely supported at the configural, metric and scalar levels. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency and temporal stability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.941, a McDonald's omega value of 0.932 and an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.873. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care Scale is a valid, reliable and gender-invariant instrument. It can be confidently used in Turkish clinical settings to assess factors contributing to implicit rationing of nursing care.
dc.identifier.articlenumbere70186
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijn.70186
dc.identifier.issn1322-7114
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid42746910
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105050452400
dc.identifier.startpagee70186
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12186
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Nursing Practice
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcross-cultural adaptation
dc.subjectimplicit rationing of nursing care
dc.subjectnurses
dc.subjectreliability and validity
dc.subjectscale validation
dc.subject.otherAdult
dc.subject.otherCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.otherFemale
dc.subject.otherHealth Care Rationing
dc.subject.otherHumans
dc.subject.otherMale
dc.subject.otherMiddle Aged
dc.subject.otherNursing Care
dc.subject.otherPsychometrics
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.othercross-sectional study
dc.subject.otherhealth care organization
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherpsychometry
dc.subject.otherquestionnaire
dc.subject.otherreproducibility
dc.subject.otherturkey (bird)
dc.subject.othervalidation study
dc.titleTurkish Adaptation, Psychometric Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of the Nursing Care Scale
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.departmentFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Fundamentals Nursing, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/ijn.70186
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED