Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics Across 32 Cultures: Good Apples Enjoy Good Quality of Life in Good Barrels

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Monetary Intelligence theory asserts that individuals apply their money attitude to frame critical concerns in the context and strategically select certain options to achieve financial goals and ultimate happiness. This study explores the bright side of Monetary Intelligence and behavioral economics, frames money attitude in the context of pay and life satisfaction, and controls money at the macro-level (GDP per capita) and micro-level (Z income). We theorize: Managers with low love of money motive but high stewardship behavior will have high subjective well-being: pay satisfaction and quality of life. Data collected from 6586 managers in 32 cultures across six continents support our theory. Interestingly, GDP per capita is related to life satisfaction, but not to pay satisfaction. Individual income is related to both life and pay satisfaction. Neither GDP nor income is related to Happiness (money makes people happy). Our theoretical model across three GDP groups offers new discoveries: In high GDP (rich) entities, high income not only reduces aspirations-Rich, Motivator, and Power, but also promotes stewardship behavior-Budget, Give/Donate, and Contribute and appreciation of Achievement. After controlling income, we demonstrate the bright side of Monetary Intelligence: Low love of money motive but high stewardship behavior define Monetary Intelligence. Good apples enjoy good quality of life in good barrels. This notion adds another explanation to managers' low magnitude of dishonesty in entities with high Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) (risk aversion for gains of high probability) . In low GDP (poor) entities, high income is related to poor Budgeting skills and escalated Happiness. These managers experience equal satisfaction with pay and life. We add a new vocabulary to the conversation of monetary intelligence, income, GDP, happiness, subjective well-being, good and bad apples and barrels, corruption, and behavioral ethics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/10699Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2980-yYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorTang, Thomas Li-Ping
dc.contributor.authorSutarso, Toto
dc.contributor.authorAnsari, Mahfooz A.
dc.contributor.authorLim, Vivien Kim Geok
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Thompson Sian Hin
dc.contributor.authorArias-Galicia, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGarber, Ilya E.
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Randy Ki-Kwan
dc.contributor.authorCharles-Pauvers, Brigitte
dc.contributor.authorLuna-Arocas, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorVlerick, Peter
dc.contributor.authorAkande, Adebowale
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Zubaidi, Abdulgawi Salim
dc.contributor.authorBorg, Mark G.
dc.contributor.authorCanova, Luigina
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Bor-Shiuan
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorDu, Linzhi
dc.contributor.authorGarcia de la Torre, Consuelo
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Abdul Hamid Safwat
dc.contributor.authorJen, Chin-Kang
dc.contributor.authorKazem, Ali Mahdi
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kilsun
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Jian
dc.contributor.authorMalovics, Eva
dc.contributor.authorManganelli, Anna Maria
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Alice S.
dc.contributor.authorMpoyi, Richard T.
dc.contributor.authorNnedum, Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu
dc.contributor.authorOsagie, Johnsto E.
dc.contributor.authorOsman-Gani, AAhad M.
dc.contributor.authorÖzbek, Mehmet Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorCosta Pereira, Francisco Jose
dc.contributor.authorPholsward, Ruja
dc.contributor.authorPitariu, Horia D.
dc.contributor.authorPolic, Marko
dc.contributor.authorSardzoska, Elisaveta Gjorgji
dc.contributor.authorSkobic, Petar
dc.contributor.authorStembridge, Allen F.
dc.contributor.authorTang, Theresa Li-Na
dc.contributor.authorUrbain, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorTrontelj, Martina
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jingqiu
dc.contributor.authorTang, Ningyu
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T09:23:14.395009818Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T09:23:14.395009818Z
dc.date.issued2018-04
dc.description.abstractMonetary Intelligence theory asserts that individuals apply their money attitude to frame critical concerns in the context and strategically select certain options to achieve financial goals and ultimate happiness. This study explores the bright side of Monetary Intelligence and behavioral economics, frames money attitude in the context of pay and life satisfaction, and controls money at the macro-level (GDP per capita) and micro-level (Z income). We theorize: Managers with low love of money motive but high stewardship behavior will have high subjective well-being: pay satisfaction and quality of life. Data collected from 6586 managers in 32 cultures across six continents support our theory. Interestingly, GDP per capita is related to life satisfaction, but not to pay satisfaction. Individual income is related to both life and pay satisfaction. Neither GDP nor income is related to Happiness (money makes people happy). Our theoretical model across three GDP groups offers new discoveries: In high GDP (rich) entities, high income not only reduces aspirations-Rich, Motivator, and Power, but also promotes stewardship behavior-Budget, Give/Donate, and Contribute and appreciation of Achievement. After controlling income, we demonstrate the bright side of Monetary Intelligence: Low love of money motive but high stewardship behavior define Monetary Intelligence. Good apples enjoy good quality of life in good barrels. This notion adds another explanation to managers' low magnitude of dishonesty in entities with high Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) (risk aversion for gains of high probability) . In low GDP (poor) entities, high income is related to poor Budgeting skills and escalated Happiness. These managers experience equal satisfaction with pay and life. We add a new vocabulary to the conversation of monetary intelligence, income, GDP, happiness, subjective well-being, good and bad apples and barrels, corruption, and behavioral ethics.
dc.description.sponsorshipFaculty Research and Creative Activity Committee of Middle Tennessee State University
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-015-2980-y
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0697
dc.identifier.endpage917
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84951784975
dc.identifier.startpage893
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/10699
dc.identifier.volume148
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000428611800012
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectProspect theory
dc.subjectGDP
dc.subjectCorruption Perceptions Index/CPI
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectCorporate ethical values
dc.subjectInternational
dc.subjectCross-cultural
dc.subjectGlobal economic pyramid
dc.subjectBehavioral economics
dc.subjectEconomists/psychologist
dc.subject.classificationBusiness
dc.subject.classificationEthics
dc.subject.classificationBusiness & Economics
dc.subject.classificationSocial Sciences - Other Topics
dc.subject.otherTRAIT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
dc.subject.otherEXTRINSIC JOB-SATISFACTION
dc.subject.otherMONEY ETHIC SCALE
dc.subject.otherPAY SATISFACTION
dc.subject.otherUNETHICAL BEHAVIOR
dc.subject.otherINTRINSIC MOTIVATION
dc.subject.otherMORTALITY SALIENCE
dc.subject.otherCOPING STRATEGIES
dc.subject.otherSELF-ESTEEM
dc.subject.otherIF MONEY
dc.titleMonetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics Across 32 Cultures: Good Apples Enjoy Good Quality of Life in Good Barrels
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex71
rdl.citation.scopus62
rdl.citation.wos37
rdl.oa.statusbronze
rdl.oa.urlhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-015-2980-y.pdf
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)