Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 13 · İklim Eylemi
  • SDG 15 · Karasal Yaşam

Özet

Europe's forests provide vital habitat for biodiversity and essential ecosystem services whose provision must be sustained or enhanced over the coming century. However, the potential to secure or increase forest ecosystem services, while securing the habitat requirements of taxa remains unclear, especially within the context of uncertain climate and socio-economic developments. To tease out the associated trade-offs and synergies, we used 10 case study landscapes within nine countries throughout Europe. Starting with the current status of the forests in the case study landscapes, we simulated forest development 100 years into the future. Simulations were embedded in three combined climate and socio-economic frame scenarios based on global and European policies which varied in their climate change mitigation efficiency. Scenarios were translated into country specific projections of climate variables, and resultant demands for wood products. Forest management regimes were projected to vary in response to these scenarios at local scales. The specific combinations of alternative forest management practices were based on parallel research and input from local forest stakeholders. For each case study, a specific forest growth simulator was used. In general, the climate scenarios applied did not cause fundamentally different ecosystem service outputs at the case study level. Our results revealed almost no reduction in outcomes for biodiversity indicators with an increase in wood production, and in some cases synergistic results occurred when diversity was actively promoted as part of the management concept. Net carbon uptake was not strongly correlated with biodiversity, indicating that biodiversity-friendly forest management doesn't need to curtail carbon sequestration. Notably, we obtained heterogeneous results for the relation between sustainable wood production and net carbon uptake. Most scenarios resulted in a more or less reduced net carbon uptake over the long term, often due to stand age class distribution shifts. Levels of sustainable wood production varied widely during the simulation period, from significant increases (Sweden, Lithuania) to minor changes (Slovakia, Turkey) and slight decreases (Ireland, Netherlands). We place our results within the larger context of European forest policy and the challenges of simulating and contrasting forest biodiversity and the ecosystem services that societies depend on.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/10680Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBiber, Peter
dc.contributor.authorFelton, Adam
dc.contributor.authorNieuwenhuis, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorLindbladh, Matts
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorBahyl, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBingöl, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Jose G.
dc.contributor.authorBotequim, Brigite
dc.contributor.authorBrukas, Vilis
dc.contributor.authorBugalho, Miguel N.
dc.contributor.authorCorradini, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Ljusk Ola
dc.contributor.authorForsell, Nicklas
dc.contributor.authorHengeveld, Geerten M.
dc.contributor.authorHoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A.
dc.contributor.authorKadiogullari, Ali Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorKarahalil, Uzay
dc.contributor.authorLodin, Isak
dc.contributor.authorLundholm, Anders
dc.contributor.authorMakrickiené, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorMasiero, Mauro
dc.contributor.authorMozgeris, Gintautas
dc.contributor.authorPivoriunas, Nerijus
dc.contributor.authorPoschenrieder, Werner
dc.contributor.authorPretzsch, Hans
dc.contributor.authorSedmák, Robert
dc.contributor.authorTucek, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T09:23:13.303574952Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T09:23:13.303574952Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.description.abstractEurope's forests provide vital habitat for biodiversity and essential ecosystem services whose provision must be sustained or enhanced over the coming century. However, the potential to secure or increase forest ecosystem services, while securing the habitat requirements of taxa remains unclear, especially within the context of uncertain climate and socio-economic developments. To tease out the associated trade-offs and synergies, we used 10 case study landscapes within nine countries throughout Europe. Starting with the current status of the forests in the case study landscapes, we simulated forest development 100 years into the future. Simulations were embedded in three combined climate and socio-economic frame scenarios based on global and European policies which varied in their climate change mitigation efficiency. Scenarios were translated into country specific projections of climate variables, and resultant demands for wood products. Forest management regimes were projected to vary in response to these scenarios at local scales. The specific combinations of alternative forest management practices were based on parallel research and input from local forest stakeholders. For each case study, a specific forest growth simulator was used. In general, the climate scenarios applied did not cause fundamentally different ecosystem service outputs at the case study level. Our results revealed almost no reduction in outcomes for biodiversity indicators with an increase in wood production, and in some cases synergistic results occurred when diversity was actively promoted as part of the management concept. Net carbon uptake was not strongly correlated with biodiversity, indicating that biodiversity-friendly forest management doesn't need to curtail carbon sequestration. Notably, we obtained heterogeneous results for the relation between sustainable wood production and net carbon uptake. Most scenarios resulted in a more or less reduced net carbon uptake over the long term, often due to stand age class distribution shifts. Levels of sustainable wood production varied widely during the simulation period, from significant increases (Sweden, Lithuania) to minor changes (Slovakia, Turkey) and slight decreases (Ireland, Netherlands). We place our results within the larger context of European forest policy and the challenges of simulating and contrasting forest biodiversity and the ecosystem services that societies depend on.
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [676754]
dc.description.sponsorshipForest Research Centre - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia I. P. (FCT), Portugal [UIDB/00239/2020]
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Applied Ecology Prof. Baeta Neves (CEABN-InBIO) - FEDER through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors-COMPETE
dc.description.sponsorshipFCT [UID/BIA/50027/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006821]
dc.description.sponsorshipH2020 Societal Challenges Programme [676754] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
dc.identifier.articlenumber547696
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fevo.2020.547696
dc.identifier.issn2296-701X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85094669827
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/10680
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000584777900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
dc.relation.ispartofFRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectecosystem services
dc.subjectbiodiversity
dc.subjectwood production
dc.subjectcarbon sequestration
dc.subjectforest management
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectsimulation
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subject.classificationEcology
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherECOSYSTEM SERVICES
dc.subject.otherCLIMATE-CHANGE
dc.subject.otherTREE MORTALITY
dc.subject.otherMANAGEMENT
dc.subject.otherIMPACTS
dc.subject.otherMONOCULTURES
dc.subject.otherSTRATEGIES
dc.subject.otherDIVERSITY
dc.subject.otherCONFLICTS
dc.subject.otherDROUGHT
dc.titleForest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex76
rdl.citation.scopus75
rdl.citation.wos67
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.547696/pdf
rdl.sdgSDG15
rdl.sdgSDG13
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)