Measuring Perceived Social Support After Disaster: Development and Validation of the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28)

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ1
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Background/Objectives: Measuring perceived social support after disaster remains an unresolved psychometric problem. Most instruments do not jointly capture the source of support (from whom it comes) and its function (how it operates). None has been validated in a disaster-survivor sample with retrospectively framed items. We developed and validated the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28), a 28-item measure integrating both dimensions. Methods: In Phase 1, a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review; a two-round Delphi with eight experts, cognitive interviews (n = 12); and a pilot study (N = 150) produced a 31-item form. In Phase 2, face-to-face data were collected from 607 adults affected by the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Türkiye). Multiple analytic frameworks converged on a five-factor, 28-item structure comprising family–relative, social environment, institutional, emotional, and instrumental–informational support. Results: The correlated five-factor model fit the independent validation sample well (CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.076, and SRMR = 0.072) and outperformed a one-factor alternative (ΔCFI = 0.222). Blocks showed strong internal consistency (ordinal α = 0.852–0.949), composite reliability (0.865–0.950), and adequate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.542–0.909). Scalar measurement invariance held across six groupings, with no meaningful differential item functioning. Convergent and discriminant evidence supported construct validity, and common-method variance was negligible. Institutional (M = 3.29) and instrumental–informational support (M = 2.99) scored lowest—a profile a global score would conceal. Conclusions: The PSSDS-28 provides promising initial psychometric evidence for a multidimensional post-disaster assessment instrument situated at the perceived–received interface, a target that general-purpose scales are not designed to capture. Criterion-related validity, cross-cultural validity, and cross-disaster replicability remain to be demonstrated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14215Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162573Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
Scopus
0
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOruç, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Ekrem
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:24.093553507Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:24.093553507Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Measuring perceived social support after disaster remains an unresolved psychometric problem. Most instruments do not jointly capture the source of support (from whom it comes) and its function (how it operates). None has been validated in a disaster-survivor sample with retrospectively framed items. We developed and validated the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28), a 28-item measure integrating both dimensions. Methods: In Phase 1, a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review; a two-round Delphi with eight experts, cognitive interviews (n = 12); and a pilot study (N = 150) produced a 31-item form. In Phase 2, face-to-face data were collected from 607 adults affected by the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Türkiye). Multiple analytic frameworks converged on a five-factor, 28-item structure comprising family–relative, social environment, institutional, emotional, and instrumental–informational support. Results: The correlated five-factor model fit the independent validation sample well (CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.076, and SRMR = 0.072) and outperformed a one-factor alternative (ΔCFI = 0.222). Blocks showed strong internal consistency (ordinal α = 0.852–0.949), composite reliability (0.865–0.950), and adequate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.542–0.909). Scalar measurement invariance held across six groupings, with no meaningful differential item functioning. Convergent and discriminant evidence supported construct validity, and common-method variance was negligible. Institutional (M = 3.29) and instrumental–informational support (M = 2.99) scored lowest—a profile a global score would conceal. Conclusions: The PSSDS-28 provides promising initial psychometric evidence for a multidimensional post-disaster assessment instrument situated at the perceived–received interface, a target that general-purpose scales are not designed to capture. Criterion-related validity, cross-cultural validity, and cross-disaster replicability remain to be demonstrated.
dc.identifier.articlenumber2573
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare14162573
dc.identifier.eissn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issue16
dc.identifier.pmid42651342
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105048455954
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14215
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001859031100001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcare (Switzerland)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectdisaster
dc.subjectmeasurement invariance
dc.subjectperceived social support
dc.subjectscale development
dc.subjectstructural validity
dc.subject.classificationHealth Care Sciences & Services
dc.subject.classificationHealth Policy & Services
dc.subject.otheradult
dc.subject.otherarticle
dc.subject.othercognition
dc.subject.otherconstruct validity
dc.subject.othercontrolled study
dc.subject.othercriterion related validity
dc.subject.othercross-cultural validity
dc.subject.otherdisaster
dc.subject.otherearthquake
dc.subject.otherfemale
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherinternal consistency
dc.subject.otherinterview
dc.subject.othermale
dc.subject.otherpilot study
dc.subject.otherPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
dc.subject.otherreliability
dc.subject.othersocial environment
dc.subject.othersocial support
dc.subject.othersystematic review
dc.subject.othervalidity
dc.titleMeasuring Perceived Social Support After Disaster: Development and Validation of the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28)
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane 29100, Türkiye
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162573
rdl.scopus.quartileQ1
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)