Bibliometric analysis of the results of Reiki research

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Introduction: This study analyses bibliometric indicators to assess global research trends on Reiki, including publication patterns and key contributing countries. Methods: The publications included in Web of Science (WOS) databases between 1970 and 2024 were reviewed. The WOS database was searched using TS= “REIKI” and all WOS indexes were included. This search identified 414 studies. Among them, letters (n = 7), editorial materials (n = 19), book reviews (n = 9), corrections (n = 2), art and poetry (n = 1), news (n = 1), and retracted publications (n = 1) were removed. The remaining 374 articles were included in this bibliometric analysis. The R-package for bibliometric analysis (Bibliometrix) was used. Results: The bibliometric analysis found that researchers published Reiki-related studies between 1983 and 2024, with a publication growth rate of 4.47 %. On average, articles were 9.5 years old and received 13 citations per document. The total number of keywords identified by the authors was 553, the number of authors in the articles was 1124 authors, the number of single-author articles was 70, the average number of publications per author was 3.5, and international co-authorships were 7.219 %. The USA, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Turkiye were the top five countries that published on Reiki, respectively. The USA, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Turkiye were the top five countries with the most cited articles, respectively. Vitale A. is the most cited author. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine is the most cited journal. Conclusion: This study is the first of its kind to evaluate the articles written by researchers in the field of Reiki only. Despite the difficulties researchers experienced in the field of Reiki, the studies have increasingly been conducted in this field over the years and have been cited studies more. This study may be helpful for researchers to determine productive countries, journals, authors, and emerging trends in Reiki by providing comprehensive analyses and structured information on this subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14181Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102442Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDemir Doğan, Melike
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:21.366242534Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:21.366242534Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study analyses bibliometric indicators to assess global research trends on Reiki, including publication patterns and key contributing countries. Methods: The publications included in Web of Science (WOS) databases between 1970 and 2024 were reviewed. The WOS database was searched using TS= “REIKI” and all WOS indexes were included. This search identified 414 studies. Among them, letters (n = 7), editorial materials (n = 19), book reviews (n = 9), corrections (n = 2), art and poetry (n = 1), news (n = 1), and retracted publications (n = 1) were removed. The remaining 374 articles were included in this bibliometric analysis. The R-package for bibliometric analysis (Bibliometrix) was used. Results: The bibliometric analysis found that researchers published Reiki-related studies between 1983 and 2024, with a publication growth rate of 4.47 %. On average, articles were 9.5 years old and received 13 citations per document. The total number of keywords identified by the authors was 553, the number of authors in the articles was 1124 authors, the number of single-author articles was 70, the average number of publications per author was 3.5, and international co-authorships were 7.219 %. The USA, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Turkiye were the top five countries that published on Reiki, respectively. The USA, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Turkiye were the top five countries with the most cited articles, respectively. Vitale A. is the most cited author. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine is the most cited journal. Conclusion: This study is the first of its kind to evaluate the articles written by researchers in the field of Reiki only. Despite the difficulties researchers experienced in the field of Reiki, the studies have increasingly been conducted in this field over the years and have been cited studies more. This study may be helpful for researchers to determine productive countries, journals, authors, and emerging trends in Reiki by providing comprehensive analyses and structured information on this subject.
dc.identifier.articlenumber102442
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102442
dc.identifier.eissn1876-3839
dc.identifier.issn1876-3820
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002806871
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14181
dc.identifier.volume75
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001475964000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Integrative Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBibliometric analysis
dc.subjectReiki
dc.subjectReiki research
dc.subjectTrends
dc.subject.classificationIntegrative & Complementary Medicine
dc.subject.otheralternative medicine
dc.subject.otherarticle
dc.subject.otherAustralia
dc.subject.otherbibliometrics
dc.subject.otherBrazil
dc.subject.otherCanada
dc.subject.otherdata base
dc.subject.othereditorial
dc.subject.othergrowth rate
dc.subject.otherhuman
dc.subject.otherReiki
dc.subject.otherretraction notice
dc.subject.othersystematic review
dc.subject.otherUnited Kingdom
dc.subject.otherUnited States
dc.subject.otherWeb of Science
dc.titleBibliometric analysis of the results of Reiki research
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.statuspreprint
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/6534
rdl.scopus.quartileQ2
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)