Application of response surface methodology for optimizing the recovery of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin using different extraction methods

MakaleYalnız künye
  • SDG 12 · Sorumlu Üretim ve Tüketim

Özet

Hazelnut skin which is a rich source of phenolic compounds is a by-product of hazelnut roasting process. In present study, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (SCE) methods were applied for recovery of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin. Response surface methodology was used to estimate optimum extraction conditions. Extraction studies were performed according to Box-Behnken Design. Temperature (UAE)/power (MAE), time and ethanol concentration were independent variables for UAE and MAE. The independent variables selected for SCE were temperature, time and pressure. The optimum extraction conditions were 45 min and 67.2–67.6% ethanol concentration, 600 W, 6 min and 55.03–56.23% ethanol concentration and 42.72–49.10 °C, 59.83–60.00 min and 10.01–11.48 bar, for UAE, MAE and SCE respectively. Total phenolic content, FRAP and 1/EC50 values at the optimum conditions were 122.99–123.01 mg GAE/g, 612.20–613.25 mmol Fe(II)/g and 4.36 mL/mg for UAE, 111.53–111.55 mg GAE/g, 582.44–582.52 mmol Fe(II)/g and 2.48 mL/mg for MAE and 69.59–72.64 mg GAE/g, 426.25–465.52 mmol Fe(II)/g and 2.18–2.27 mL/mg for SCE, respectively. Maceration was performed for comparison with novel methods. UAE was found to be the best method of the extraction of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin with the highest total phenolic content and antioxidant activity values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15130Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOdabaş, Halil İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Ilkay
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:23:37.301361055Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:23:37.301361055Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractHazelnut skin which is a rich source of phenolic compounds is a by-product of hazelnut roasting process. In present study, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (SCE) methods were applied for recovery of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin. Response surface methodology was used to estimate optimum extraction conditions. Extraction studies were performed according to Box-Behnken Design. Temperature (UAE)/power (MAE), time and ethanol concentration were independent variables for UAE and MAE. The independent variables selected for SCE were temperature, time and pressure. The optimum extraction conditions were 45 min and 67.2–67.6% ethanol concentration, 600 W, 6 min and 55.03–56.23% ethanol concentration and 42.72–49.10 °C, 59.83–60.00 min and 10.01–11.48 bar, for UAE, MAE and SCE respectively. Total phenolic content, FRAP and 1/EC50 values at the optimum conditions were 122.99–123.01 mg GAE/g, 612.20–613.25 mmol Fe(II)/g and 4.36 mL/mg for UAE, 111.53–111.55 mg GAE/g, 582.44–582.52 mmol Fe(II)/g and 2.48 mL/mg for MAE and 69.59–72.64 mg GAE/g, 426.25–465.52 mmol Fe(II)/g and 2.18–2.27 mL/mg for SCE, respectively. Maceration was performed for comparison with novel methods. UAE was found to be the best method of the extraction of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin with the highest total phenolic content and antioxidant activity values.
dc.description.sponsorshipOndokuz Mayıs University, (PYO.MUH.1904.11.012)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.033
dc.identifier.eissn1872-633X
dc.identifier.endpage124
dc.identifier.issn0926-6690
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84978803193
dc.identifier.startpage114
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15130
dc.identifier.volume91
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382600300014
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofIndustrial Crops and Products
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAntioxidant activity
dc.subjectHazelnut skin
dc.subjectMicrowave-assisted extraction
dc.subjectPhenolic
dc.subjectResponse surface methodology
dc.subjectSupercritical fluid extraction
dc.subjectUltrasound-assisted extraction
dc.subject.classificationAgricultural Engineering
dc.subject.classificationAgronomy
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture
dc.subject.otherCorylus
dc.subject.otherAntioxidants
dc.subject.otherCarbon
dc.subject.otherCarbon dioxide
dc.subject.otherEffluent treatment
dc.subject.otherEthanol
dc.subject.otherIron compounds
dc.subject.otherPhenols
dc.subject.otherPyrene
dc.subject.otherSupercritical fluid extraction
dc.subject.otherSupercritical fluids
dc.subject.otherSurface properties
dc.subject.otherAnti-oxidant activities
dc.subject.otherMicrowave-assisted extraction
dc.subject.otherPhenolic
dc.subject.otherResponse surface methodology
dc.subject.otherUltrasound-assisted extraction
dc.subject.otherantioxidant
dc.subject.otherconcentration (composition)
dc.subject.otherdicotyledon
dc.subject.otherextraction method
dc.subject.othermicrowave radiation
dc.subject.othernut
dc.subject.otheroptimization
dc.subject.otherphenolic compound
dc.subject.otherskin
dc.subject.othersupercritical flow
dc.subject.othertemperature
dc.subject.othertime dependent behavior
dc.subject.otherultrasonics
dc.subject.otherExtraction
dc.titleApplication of response surface methodology for optimizing the recovery of phenolic compounds from hazelnut skin using different extraction methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex97
rdl.citation.scopus89
rdl.citation.wos78
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.sdgSDG12
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)