Implementation of different encoding types on structural optimization based on adaptive genetic algorithm

MakaleYalnız künye

Özet

In this study, the use of new alternatives of encoding types such as quaternary encoding and octal encoding is reviewed along with that of binary and value encodings and how they provide contribution to efficiency and robustness of genetic algorithm is discussed in structural problems. In addition to new alternatives of encoding types, a genetic algorithm with adaptive manner is presented so that an adaptive approach including adaptive mutation and adaptive crossover operators is employed. It is concluded that it is not possible to tell that one of the encoding types is exactly dominant over the others in all aspects such as convergence, finding the optimum solution, and iteration number. However, it is worth to say that to run genetic process with different encoding types should be considered since one of the runs can give more appropriate solution than that of the others.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14140Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.019Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBekiroǧlu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorDede, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorAyvaz, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:18.053235684Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:18.053235684Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the use of new alternatives of encoding types such as quaternary encoding and octal encoding is reviewed along with that of binary and value encodings and how they provide contribution to efficiency and robustness of genetic algorithm is discussed in structural problems. In addition to new alternatives of encoding types, a genetic algorithm with adaptive manner is presented so that an adaptive approach including adaptive mutation and adaptive crossover operators is employed. It is concluded that it is not possible to tell that one of the encoding types is exactly dominant over the others in all aspects such as convergence, finding the optimum solution, and iteration number. However, it is worth to say that to run genetic process with different encoding types should be considered since one of the runs can give more appropriate solution than that of the others.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.019
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6925
dc.identifier.endpage835
dc.identifier.issn0168-874X
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-69349093894
dc.identifier.startpage826
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14140
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269401500008
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartofFinite Elements in Analysis and Design
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAdaptive crossover
dc.subjectAdaptive mutation
dc.subjectGenetic algorithm
dc.subjectNew encoding types
dc.subjectOptimum solution
dc.subject.classificationMathematics, Applied
dc.subject.classificationMechanics
dc.subject.classificationMathematics
dc.subject.otherEncoding (symbols)
dc.subject.otherGenetic algorithms
dc.subject.otherMathematical operators
dc.subject.otherStructural design
dc.subject.otherStructural optimization
dc.subject.otherAdaptive approach
dc.subject.otherAdaptive crossover
dc.subject.otherAdaptive genetic algorithms
dc.subject.otherAdaptive mutation
dc.subject.otherCrossover operator
dc.subject.otherEncodings
dc.subject.otherGenetic process
dc.subject.otherIteration numbers
dc.subject.otherNew encoding types
dc.subject.otherOptimum solution
dc.subject.otherStructural problems
dc.subject.otherAdaptive algorithms
dc.titleImplementation of different encoding types on structural optimization based on adaptive genetic algorithm
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex26
rdl.citation.scopus24
rdl.citation.wos21
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)