Remote sensing and monitoring of water resources: A comparative study of different indices and thresholding methods

MakaleYalnız künye
  • SDG 6 · Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon

Özet

Water resources are essential for the ecological system and the development of civilization. Water is imperative factor for health preservation and sustaining various human activities, including industrial production, agriculture, and daily life. Remote sensing provides a cost-effective and practical means to detect and monitor water bodies, offers valuable insights into the impact of climatic events on water structures, especially in coastal lake regions. The research primarily utilizes Landsat-9 OLI-2 satellite images to evaluate the effectiveness of various water indices (WRI, NWI, MNDWI, NDWI) in combination with global automatic thresholding methods (K-Means, Zhenzhou's, Adaptive, Intermodes, Prewitt and Mendelsohn's Minimum, Maximum Entropy, Median, Concavity, Percentile, Intermeans, Kittler and Illingworth's Minimum Error, Tsai's Moments, Otsu's, Huang's fuzzy, Triangle, Mean, IsoData, Li's). The study was carried out on Lake Nazik, Lake Iznik, and Lake Beyşehir, which have unique geographical characteristics, and examined the adaptability and robustness of the selected indices and thresholding methods. MNDWI consistently stands out as a robust index for water extraction, delivering accurate results across different thresholding methods in regions all three lakes. As a result of quite extensive analysis, it is obtained that MNDWI and NDWI are reliable choices for water feature extraction in various lake environments, but the specific index should consider the thresholding method and unique lake characteristics. The Minimum thresholding method stands out as the most effective thresholding technique, demonstrating impressive results across different lakes. Specifically, it achieved an average Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 78.97 and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) of 99.37 for Lake Nazik, 74.08 PSNR and 98.34 SSIM for Lake Iznik, and 63.96 PSNR and 93.61 SSIM for Lake Beyşehir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14022Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGünen, Mehmet Akif
dc.contributor.authorAtasever, Umit Haluk
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:07.106022573Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:07.106022573Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractWater resources are essential for the ecological system and the development of civilization. Water is imperative factor for health preservation and sustaining various human activities, including industrial production, agriculture, and daily life. Remote sensing provides a cost-effective and practical means to detect and monitor water bodies, offers valuable insights into the impact of climatic events on water structures, especially in coastal lake regions. The research primarily utilizes Landsat-9 OLI-2 satellite images to evaluate the effectiveness of various water indices (WRI, NWI, MNDWI, NDWI) in combination with global automatic thresholding methods (K-Means, Zhenzhou's, Adaptive, Intermodes, Prewitt and Mendelsohn's Minimum, Maximum Entropy, Median, Concavity, Percentile, Intermeans, Kittler and Illingworth's Minimum Error, Tsai's Moments, Otsu's, Huang's fuzzy, Triangle, Mean, IsoData, Li's). The study was carried out on Lake Nazik, Lake Iznik, and Lake Beyşehir, which have unique geographical characteristics, and examined the adaptability and robustness of the selected indices and thresholding methods. MNDWI consistently stands out as a robust index for water extraction, delivering accurate results across different thresholding methods in regions all three lakes. As a result of quite extensive analysis, it is obtained that MNDWI and NDWI are reliable choices for water feature extraction in various lake environments, but the specific index should consider the thresholding method and unique lake characteristics. The Minimum thresholding method stands out as the most effective thresholding technique, demonstrating impressive results across different lakes. Specifically, it achieved an average Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 78.97 and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) of 99.37 for Lake Nazik, 74.08 PSNR and 98.34 SSIM for Lake Iznik, and 63.96 PSNR and 93.61 SSIM for Lake Beyşehir.
dc.identifier.articlenumber172117
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172117
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.pmid38565346
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189683103
dc.identifier.startpage172117
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14022
dc.identifier.volume926
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001216902200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLandsat 9
dc.subjectThreshold methods
dc.subjectWater body
dc.subjectWater indices
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subject.otherBeysehir Lake
dc.subject.otherBursa [Turkey]
dc.subject.otherIznik Lake
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherCost effectiveness
dc.subject.otherExtraction
dc.subject.otherK-means clustering
dc.subject.otherLakes
dc.subject.otherMaximum entropy methods
dc.subject.otherRemote sensing
dc.subject.otherSignal to noise ratio
dc.subject.otherwater
dc.subject.otherLANDSAT
dc.subject.otherLandsat 9
dc.subject.otherPeak signal to noise ratio
dc.subject.otherRemote-sensing
dc.subject.otherSimilarity indices
dc.subject.otherStructural similarity
dc.subject.otherThreshold methods
dc.subject.otherThresholding methods
dc.subject.otherWater index
dc.subject.otherWaterbodies
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherindustrial production
dc.subject.othersatellite imagery
dc.subject.otherwater resource
dc.subject.otheradaptive thresholding method
dc.subject.otheragriculture
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.othercivilization
dc.subject.otherconcavity thresholding method
dc.subject.otherecosystem resilience
dc.subject.otherentropy
dc.subject.othererror
dc.subject.otherfeature extraction
dc.subject.otherhuang fuzzy thresholding method
dc.subject.otherIllingworth thresholding method
dc.subject.otherIntermodes thresholding method
dc.subject.otherisodata thresholding method
dc.subject.otherKittler thresholding method
dc.subject.otherlake
dc.subject.otherlake ecosystem
dc.subject.otherLi’s thresholding method
dc.subject.othermathematical analysis
dc.subject.othermendelsohn thresholding method
dc.subject.otherModified Normalized Difference Water Index
dc.subject.othermonitoring
dc.subject.otherNormalized Difference Water Index
dc.subject.otherNormalized Water Index
dc.subject.otherotsu thresholding method
dc.subject.otherpercentile thresholding method
dc.subject.otherprewitt thresholding method
dc.subject.othersignal noise ratio
dc.subject.othertriangle thresholding method
dc.subject.othertsai thresholding method
dc.subject.otherwater supply
dc.subject.otherzhenzhou thresholding method
dc.subject.otherhuman activities
dc.subject.othermaximum entropy model
dc.subject.othernonhuman
dc.subject.otherwater structure
dc.titleRemote sensing and monitoring of water resources: A comparative study of different indices and thresholding methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex52
rdl.citation.scopus56
rdl.citation.wos46
rdl.departmentDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Gümüşhane University, 29100 Gümüşhane, Turkiye
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.sdgSDG06
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)