Variability of Schmidt Rebound Values in Volcanic Rocks (Basalt and Lapilli Tuff): Comparative Effect of Surface Roughness, Alteration, and Testing Methods

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

Enhancing the sustainability and safety of rock engineering requires understanding how micro-structural and alteration conditions influence the geomechanical properties of rocks in geotechnical projects. The determination of surface hardness using the Schmidt Hammer is an interdisciplinary experimental method employed in mining, geology, and civil engineering. This study quantitatively evaluates the effects of surface roughness, weathering degree, and evaluation procedures on Schmidt rebound values obtained from basalt and lapilli tuff. Field measurements on eight surfaces produced rebound values between 10 and 60, with standard deviations ranging from 2.4 to 11, reflecting substantial variability related to roughness and alteration. Laboratory results showed that cut surfaces yielded the highest hardness values (Mean ≈ 57–58) with very low variability (SD ≈ 1.1–1.6), whereas natural surfaces exhibited markedly lower rebound values (Mean ≈ 19–22) and greater scatter (SD ≈ 4–4.5). A strong correlation (R2 > 0.97) was observed between JRC roughness and rebound values in laboratory-prepared samples. The percentage difference among the USBR, ASTM, and Sumner & Nel methods remained below 5% when the standard deviation of measurements was under 2, indicating that method selection becomes critical only for heterogeneous surfaces. Mineralogical heterogeneity further increased variability in lapilli tuff, whereas basalt provided highly consistent responses. Overall, this study introduces quantitative thresholds linking roughness, weathering, and statistical variability, offering a more rigorous and reproducible framework for interpreting Schmidt hardness measurements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13848Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020886Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorKülekçi, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Yaşar
dc.contributor.authorKolaylı, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:51.833030369Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:51.833030369Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractEnhancing the sustainability and safety of rock engineering requires understanding how micro-structural and alteration conditions influence the geomechanical properties of rocks in geotechnical projects. The determination of surface hardness using the Schmidt Hammer is an interdisciplinary experimental method employed in mining, geology, and civil engineering. This study quantitatively evaluates the effects of surface roughness, weathering degree, and evaluation procedures on Schmidt rebound values obtained from basalt and lapilli tuff. Field measurements on eight surfaces produced rebound values between 10 and 60, with standard deviations ranging from 2.4 to 11, reflecting substantial variability related to roughness and alteration. Laboratory results showed that cut surfaces yielded the highest hardness values (Mean ≈ 57–58) with very low variability (SD ≈ 1.1–1.6), whereas natural surfaces exhibited markedly lower rebound values (Mean ≈ 19–22) and greater scatter (SD ≈ 4–4.5). A strong correlation (R2 > 0.97) was observed between JRC roughness and rebound values in laboratory-prepared samples. The percentage difference among the USBR, ASTM, and Sumner & Nel methods remained below 5% when the standard deviation of measurements was under 2, indicating that method selection becomes critical only for heterogeneous surfaces. Mineralogical heterogeneity further increased variability in lapilli tuff, whereas basalt provided highly consistent responses. Overall, this study introduces quantitative thresholds linking roughness, weathering, and statistical variability, offering a more rigorous and reproducible framework for interpreting Schmidt hardness measurements.
dc.identifier.articlenumber886
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app16020886
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105028790728
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13848
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001671967400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecthardness–roughness relationship
dc.subjectmineral heterogeneity
dc.subjectrock weathering
dc.subjectSchmidt rebound value
dc.subjectsurface preparation
dc.subject.classificationChemistry, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationMaterials Science, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationPhysics, Applied
dc.subject.classificationChemistry
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationMaterials Science
dc.subject.classificationPhysics
dc.subject.otherHardness
dc.subject.otherRock mechanics
dc.subject.otherVolcanic rocks
dc.subject.otherWeathering
dc.subject.othercalcium carbonate
dc.subject.otherolivine
dc.subject.otherpyroxene
dc.subject.otherunclassified drug
dc.subject.otherHardness–roughness relationship
dc.subject.otherMineral heterogeneity
dc.subject.otherRebound value
dc.subject.otherRock weathering
dc.subject.otherSchmidt
dc.subject.otherSchmidt rebound value
dc.subject.otherStandard deviation
dc.subject.otherSurface preparation
dc.subject.otherTesting method
dc.subject.otherVolcanics
dc.subject.otherArticle
dc.subject.otherbasalt
dc.subject.othercell differentiation
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherenergy absorption
dc.subject.othergeology
dc.subject.othergrain (structure)
dc.subject.otherimage analysis
dc.subject.otherlapilli tuff
dc.subject.othermeasurement
dc.subject.othernonhuman
dc.subject.otherporosity
dc.subject.otherqualitative analysis
dc.subject.otherquantitative analysis
dc.subject.otherrock
dc.subject.othersurface roughness
dc.subject.othervolcanic rock
dc.titleVariability of Schmidt Rebound Values in Volcanic Rocks (Basalt and Lapilli Tuff): Comparative Effect of Surface Roughness, Alteration, and Testing Methods
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/16/2/886/pdf
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)