Investigating class granularity in historical aerial image segmentation: a comparative analysis of CNN and transformer-based models

MakaleYalnız künye

Özet

Historical aerial imagery acts as a crucial bridge to the pre-satellite era, becoming increasingly vital for quantifying long-term land cover changes and supporting retrospective environmental studies. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of CNN-based (DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, HRNet, ConvNeXt) and transformer-based (ViT, Swin Transformer, BEiT) architectures for semantic segmentation of historical aerial imagery. In particular, the potential of Transformer-based architectures for semantic segmentation of panchromatic historical aerial imagery in the context of increasing segmentation complexity remains underexplored. We assess how effectively each architecture handles increasing class granularity and captures finer-grained land-cover semantics. Experiments are conducted at three levels of detail: binary, three-class, and five-class segmentation. The dataset comprises panchromatic images from 1960, captured in Turkey. Precision, recall, F1-score, and intersection-over-union (IoU) metrics were employed to evaluate class-wise performance. In the binary ground and non-ground segmentation task, all architectures achieved mean F1-scores of 0.945–0.959 and mean IoU values of 0.905–0.921. In the three-class and five-class tasks, mean F1-scores ranged from 0.861–0.902 and 0.754–0.803, with mean IoU values of 0.777–0.831 and 0.623–0.682, respectively. In the three-class setting, ConvNeXt, Swin Transformer, and BEiT clustered towards the upper end of the mean metrics with only small differences among them. Increasing class granularity from three to five reduced mean performance across architectures, with decreases of up to 0.123 in mean F1-score and up to 0.176 in mean IoU. Across all classification levels, ConvNeXt consistently achieved higher performance, distinguishing itself specifically in the five-class task with the highest F1-scores and IoU values. ConvNeXt outperformed both the CNN-based baselines and Transformer-based models in the challenging building and road categories.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13547Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDihkan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Gülsena
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Samed
dc.contributor.authorKarsli, Fevzi
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:21:29.675288326Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:21:29.675288326Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractHistorical aerial imagery acts as a crucial bridge to the pre-satellite era, becoming increasingly vital for quantifying long-term land cover changes and supporting retrospective environmental studies. This study presents a comprehensive comparison of CNN-based (DeepLabV3+, PSPNet, HRNet, ConvNeXt) and transformer-based (ViT, Swin Transformer, BEiT) architectures for semantic segmentation of historical aerial imagery. In particular, the potential of Transformer-based architectures for semantic segmentation of panchromatic historical aerial imagery in the context of increasing segmentation complexity remains underexplored. We assess how effectively each architecture handles increasing class granularity and captures finer-grained land-cover semantics. Experiments are conducted at three levels of detail: binary, three-class, and five-class segmentation. The dataset comprises panchromatic images from 1960, captured in Turkey. Precision, recall, F1-score, and intersection-over-union (IoU) metrics were employed to evaluate class-wise performance. In the binary ground and non-ground segmentation task, all architectures achieved mean F1-scores of 0.945–0.959 and mean IoU values of 0.905–0.921. In the three-class and five-class tasks, mean F1-scores ranged from 0.861–0.902 and 0.754–0.803, with mean IoU values of 0.777–0.831 and 0.623–0.682, respectively. In the three-class setting, ConvNeXt, Swin Transformer, and BEiT clustered towards the upper end of the mean metrics with only small differences among them. Increasing class granularity from three to five reduced mean performance across architectures, with decreases of up to 0.123 in mean F1-score and up to 0.176 in mean IoU. Across all classification levels, ConvNeXt consistently achieved higher performance, distinguishing itself specifically in the five-class task with the highest F1-scores and IoU values. ConvNeXt outperformed both the CNN-based baselines and Transformer-based models in the challenging building and road categories.
dc.description.sponsorshipGeneral Directorate Of Mapping (GDM)
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01431161.2026.2660253
dc.identifier.eissn1366-5901
dc.identifier.endpage4964
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105036537860
dc.identifier.startpage4934
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/13547
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001747277200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectHistorical aerial imagery
dc.subjectland cover classification
dc.subjectVision Transformer
dc.subject.classificationRemote Sensing
dc.subject.classificationImaging Science & Photographic Technology
dc.subject.otherTurkey
dc.subject.otherAerial photography
dc.subject.otherAntennas
dc.subject.otherArchitecture
dc.subject.otherBridges
dc.subject.otherClassification (of information)
dc.subject.otherImage analysis
dc.subject.otherImage classification
dc.subject.otherSatellite imagery
dc.subject.otherSemantic Segmentation
dc.subject.otherAerial imagery
dc.subject.otherAerial images
dc.subject.otherComparative analyzes
dc.subject.otherF1 scores
dc.subject.otherHistorical aerial imagery
dc.subject.otherImages segmentations
dc.subject.otherLand cover classification
dc.subject.otherPerformance
dc.subject.otherVision transformer
dc.subject.otherairborne sensing
dc.subject.otherartificial neural network
dc.subject.othercomparative study
dc.subject.otherimage processing
dc.subject.otherland cover
dc.subject.otherpanchromatic image
dc.subject.othersegmentation
dc.subject.otherSemantics
dc.titleInvestigating class granularity in historical aerial image segmentation: a comparative analysis of CNN and transformer-based models
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusclosed
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)