The effect of energy resolution of detection instrument on mass attenuation coefficient

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

The effect of energy resolution of two detection systems, HPGe and NaI(Tl), was determined by Monte Carlo (MC) calculation on mass attenuation coefficients of magnesium (Mg) and tungsten (W). In order to reveal the energy resolution effect, the detectors' collimator diameters were changed from 2 mm to 20 mm while sending collimated photon beams to the absorber material. It was observed that mass attenuation coefficients were increased with increasing collimator diameters. The performances of HPGe and NaI(Tl) detectors were quantified. The calculated results were compared with experimental results for Mg at energy of gamma rays 662 keV for different collimator diameters using both HPGe and NaI(Tl). It was observed that the MC calculation results were in a good agreement with the experimental data within the relative error from around 4% to 8%.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12976Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, N.
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, S.A.
dc.contributor.authorDemirtaş, Ö.F.
dc.contributor.authorÇevik, U.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:20:46.666077315Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:20:46.666077315Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe effect of energy resolution of two detection systems, HPGe and NaI(Tl), was determined by Monte Carlo (MC) calculation on mass attenuation coefficients of magnesium (Mg) and tungsten (W). In order to reveal the energy resolution effect, the detectors' collimator diameters were changed from 2 mm to 20 mm while sending collimated photon beams to the absorber material. It was observed that mass attenuation coefficients were increased with increasing collimator diameters. The performances of HPGe and NaI(Tl) detectors were quantified. The calculated results were compared with experimental results for Mg at energy of gamma rays 662 keV for different collimator diameters using both HPGe and NaI(Tl). It was observed that the MC calculation results were in a good agreement with the experimental data within the relative error from around 4% to 8%.
dc.identifier.articlenumberP10012
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/p10012
dc.identifier.issn1748-0221
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056112438
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12976
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000446671600003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Instrumentation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.subjectScintillators, scintillation and light emission processes (solid, gas and liquid scintillators)
dc.subjectSimulation methods and programs
dc.subjectSolid state detectors
dc.subject.classificationInstruments & Instrumentation
dc.subject.otherData reduction
dc.subject.otherGamma rays
dc.subject.otherGermanium compounds
dc.subject.otherIodine compounds
dc.subject.otherIonization
dc.subject.otherScintillation counters
dc.subject.otherSemiconductor detectors
dc.subject.otherSodium Iodide
dc.subject.otherAbsorber material
dc.subject.otherCalculation results
dc.subject.otherDetection instruments
dc.subject.otherDetection system
dc.subject.otherEmission process
dc.subject.otherEnergy resolutions
dc.subject.otherMass attenuation coefficients
dc.subject.otherSolid state detectors
dc.subject.otherPhosphorus compounds
dc.titleThe effect of energy resolution of detection instrument on mass attenuation coefficient
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex7
rdl.citation.scopus8
rdl.citation.wos7
rdl.oa.statusbronze
rdl.oa.urlhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10012/pdf
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)