Combined innovative trend analysis methods for seasonal trend testing

MakaleAçık Erişim
  • SDG 6 · Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon

Özet

While holistic trend identification is essential, it does not consider the periodic, e.g., monthly, trend characteristics needed to identify seasonal trend behavior. Furthermore, identifying seasonal trends can help manage or regulate water resources systems and irrigation and agricultural operations. In this study, the innovative trend significance test (ITST), the revised ITST, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which are non-parametric methods, are proposed as alternative seasonal trend tests by combining them with the innovative polygon trend analysis (IPTA), which provides visual and linguistic examinations of seasonal behaviors. Groundwater level data from the Chilgrove House (United Kingdom), flow data from the Danube River Basin (Romania), precipitation and temperature data from Türkiye were used to compare the proposed methods with the seasonal Mann-Kendall (SMK) method. For temperature and groundwater level data, all methods showed an increasing trend at different confidence intervals, but for other data, trends emerged according to the characteristics of the methods. So, some of the proposed methods are more rigid than the SMK in trend detection, while others are more sensitive. In addition to the advantage of its applications to seasonal trend behaviors, the proposed significance tests are combined with the IPTA method and comparable alternative methods to the SMK. So, seasons with a clear increase or decrease can be seen visually in the proposed combined methods contrary to the SMK method. Thus, both seasonal trend behaviors and inter-seasonal transitions can be examined graphically, and seasonal significance testing can be applied. According to the characteristics of these combined methods, they can be used not only for seasonal trend tests, just like the SMK method, but also for regional trend tests using stations data instead of seasons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12490Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorŞan, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:20:10.849079418Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:20:10.849079418Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractWhile holistic trend identification is essential, it does not consider the periodic, e.g., monthly, trend characteristics needed to identify seasonal trend behavior. Furthermore, identifying seasonal trends can help manage or regulate water resources systems and irrigation and agricultural operations. In this study, the innovative trend significance test (ITST), the revised ITST, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which are non-parametric methods, are proposed as alternative seasonal trend tests by combining them with the innovative polygon trend analysis (IPTA), which provides visual and linguistic examinations of seasonal behaviors. Groundwater level data from the Chilgrove House (United Kingdom), flow data from the Danube River Basin (Romania), precipitation and temperature data from Türkiye were used to compare the proposed methods with the seasonal Mann-Kendall (SMK) method. For temperature and groundwater level data, all methods showed an increasing trend at different confidence intervals, but for other data, trends emerged according to the characteristics of the methods. So, some of the proposed methods are more rigid than the SMK in trend detection, while others are more sensitive. In addition to the advantage of its applications to seasonal trend behaviors, the proposed significance tests are combined with the IPTA method and comparable alternative methods to the SMK. So, seasons with a clear increase or decrease can be seen visually in the proposed combined methods contrary to the SMK method. Thus, both seasonal trend behaviors and inter-seasonal transitions can be examined graphically, and seasonal significance testing can be applied. According to the characteristics of these combined methods, they can be used not only for seasonal trend tests, just like the SMK method, but also for regional trend tests using stations data instead of seasons.
dc.identifier.articlenumber132418
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132418
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2707
dc.identifier.issn0022-1694
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211149621
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/12490
dc.identifier.volume649
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001378047600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hydrology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectInnovative trend analysis
dc.subjectPolygon trend
dc.subjectSeasonal Mann-Kendall
dc.subjectSignificance test
dc.subjectWilcoxon test
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Civil
dc.subject.classificationGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationWater Resources
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationGeology
dc.subject.otherInnovative trend analyze
dc.subject.otherInnovative trends
dc.subject.otherMann-Kendall
dc.subject.otherPolygon trend
dc.subject.otherSeasonal mann-kendall
dc.subject.otherSeasonal trends
dc.subject.otherSignificance test
dc.subject.otherTrend analysis
dc.subject.otherTrend tests
dc.subject.otherWilcoxon test
dc.subject.otherdetection method
dc.subject.otherinnovation
dc.subject.otherinstrumentation
dc.subject.otherseasonal variation
dc.subject.othertesting method
dc.titleCombined innovative trend analysis methods for seasonal trend testing
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex30
rdl.citation.scopus28
rdl.citation.wos25
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.statuspreprint
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/6453
rdl.sdgSDG06
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)