A Comparison of Fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence) and Tasawwuf (Sufism) In Terms of Purpose

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

In the Islamic scientific tradition, kalam (fundamental Islamic beliefs), fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), and tasawwuf (Sufism) are considered as three branches of Islamic science that\ris directly concern life. In this article, fiqh and tasawwuf which are mentioned above, are compared in terms of their objectives. The study involves an introduction and two sections. In the\rintroduction, definitions, subjects, virtues, sources, purposes, and other relevant issues of these branches are mentioned and the objectives of fiqh and tasawwuf are compared. In the first\rsection, general aims and benefits of both tasawwuf and fiqh are explicated, while the specific\rpurposes and benefits of both branches are discussed in the second. Special purposes are also\rdiscussed in terms of their contribution to the establishment and continuation of the individual\rand social order. Individual and social purposes are evaluated in compliance with the general\rclassification of the subjects of fiqh. The said classification covers the fields of prayers, deeds,\rmarriage (family) and criminal law. Fiqh and tasawwuf, both of which are common in being practical sciences, are evaluated according to their common and divergent features in terms of their\rgoals and purposes, and it is emphasized that they complement each other in religious living.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/17368Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46231/sufiyye.1015842Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
OpenAlex
2
TR Dizin
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÇatak, Adem
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Fetullah
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:38:50.843138497Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:38:50.843138497Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn the Islamic scientific tradition, kalam (fundamental Islamic beliefs), fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), and tasawwuf (Sufism) are considered as three branches of Islamic science that\ris directly concern life. In this article, fiqh and tasawwuf which are mentioned above, are compared in terms of their objectives. The study involves an introduction and two sections. In the\rintroduction, definitions, subjects, virtues, sources, purposes, and other relevant issues of these branches are mentioned and the objectives of fiqh and tasawwuf are compared. In the first\rsection, general aims and benefits of both tasawwuf and fiqh are explicated, while the specific\rpurposes and benefits of both branches are discussed in the second. Special purposes are also\rdiscussed in terms of their contribution to the establishment and continuation of the individual\rand social order. Individual and social purposes are evaluated in compliance with the general\rclassification of the subjects of fiqh. The said classification covers the fields of prayers, deeds,\rmarriage (family) and criminal law. Fiqh and tasawwuf, both of which are common in being practical sciences, are evaluated according to their common and divergent features in terms of their\rgoals and purposes, and it is emphasized that they complement each other in religious living.
dc.identifier.doi10.46231/sufiyye.1015842
dc.identifier.eissn2791-6804
dc.identifier.endpage228
dc.identifier.issn2791-6650
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage197
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/17368
dc.identifier.volume0
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofSufiyye
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDin Bilimi
dc.subjectBeşeri Bilimler
dc.titleA Comparison of Fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence) and Tasawwuf (Sufism) In Terms of Purpose
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex2
rdl.citation.trdizin1
rdl.oa.statushybrid
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2051010
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN