A new method for the evaluation of cervical dystonia

MakaleYayıncıda açık erişimScopus SJRQ4
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Objectives: The study aimed to develop a measurement method that yielded objective data for the clinical assessment of cervical dystonia using a Kinect camera system. Patients and methods: This double-blind, parallel-group method development study included 22 patients with cervical dystonia (3 males, 19 females; mean age: 47 years; range, 34 to 60 years) and 20 healthy individuals (13 females, 7 males; mean age: 32 years; age range, 22 to 65). Using cameras and a computer software, the head-neck postures of 40 healthy participants were recorded in the virtual environment. Using the device, 22 patients with cervical dystonia were examined both at rest and while moving with different parts of the body. Two different experts evaluated and scored the cases using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Tsui scale. Results: A three-way comparison revealed interclass correlations between the coefficients of 0.799 (79.9%) and 0.784 (78.4%) for at rest and with movement, respectively. The two-way comparison of the experts revealed correlation coefficients of 0.717 (71.7%) and 0.692 (69.2%) for at rest and with movement, respectively. A three-way comparison of the device and Expert 1 and Expert 2 TWSTRS scores revealed interrater agreement values of 0.6 and 0.8 (good) and 0.6 and 0.8 (good) while at rest and with movement, respectively. A three-way comparison of the device and Expert 1 and Expert 2 Tsui scores revealed interrater agreement values of 0.6 and 0.8 (good) and 0.4 and 0.6 (moderate) while at rest and with movement, respectively. Conclusion: The newly developed system was a sensitive tool for use in the kinematic evaluation of patients with cervical dystonia and could prove beneficial in diagnosis and treatment follow-up.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/16413Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55697/tnd.2025.257Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
WoS
1
OpenAlex
1
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Hanife
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorAcarer, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:29:19.562748269Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:29:19.562748269Z
dc.date.issued2025-03
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The study aimed to develop a measurement method that yielded objective data for the clinical assessment of cervical dystonia using a Kinect camera system. Patients and methods: This double-blind, parallel-group method development study included 22 patients with cervical dystonia (3 males, 19 females; mean age: 47 years; range, 34 to 60 years) and 20 healthy individuals (13 females, 7 males; mean age: 32 years; age range, 22 to 65). Using cameras and a computer software, the head-neck postures of 40 healthy participants were recorded in the virtual environment. Using the device, 22 patients with cervical dystonia were examined both at rest and while moving with different parts of the body. Two different experts evaluated and scored the cases using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Tsui scale. Results: A three-way comparison revealed interclass correlations between the coefficients of 0.799 (79.9%) and 0.784 (78.4%) for at rest and with movement, respectively. The two-way comparison of the experts revealed correlation coefficients of 0.717 (71.7%) and 0.692 (69.2%) for at rest and with movement, respectively. A three-way comparison of the device and Expert 1 and Expert 2 TWSTRS scores revealed interrater agreement values of 0.6 and 0.8 (good) and 0.6 and 0.8 (good) while at rest and with movement, respectively. A three-way comparison of the device and Expert 1 and Expert 2 Tsui scores revealed interrater agreement values of 0.6 and 0.8 (good) and 0.4 and 0.6 (moderate) while at rest and with movement, respectively. Conclusion: The newly developed system was a sensitive tool for use in the kinematic evaluation of patients with cervical dystonia and could prove beneficial in diagnosis and treatment follow-up.
dc.identifier.doi10.55697/tnd.2025.257
dc.identifier.eissn1309-2545
dc.identifier.endpage61
dc.identifier.issn1301-062X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage53
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/16413
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001456073700008
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGALENOS PUBL HOUSE
dc.relation.ispartofTURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCervical dystonia
dc.subjectkinect camera
dc.subjectToronto Western Spasmodic
dc.subjectTorticollis Rating Scale
dc.subjectTsui
dc.subject.classificationClinical Neurology
dc.subject.classificationNeurosciences & Neurology
dc.subject.otherBOTULINUM-TOXIN
dc.subject.otherRATING-SCALES
dc.subject.otherDOUBLE-BLIND
dc.titleA new method for the evaluation of cervical dystonia
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex1
rdl.citation.wos1
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.scopus.quartileQ4
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)