Unipolar mania as a distinct clinical presentation: Differences in illness course and psychosocial functioning compared with bipolar I disorder

MakaleAçık ErişimScopus SJRQ4
  • SDG 3 · Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam

Özet

Objective: Growing evidence suggests that unipolar mania (UM) may represent a distinct clinical condition rather than a subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). The present study aimed to compare the sociodemographic characteristics, clinical features, and psychosocial functioning of euthymic patients with UM or bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and healthy control subjects. Method: This cross-sectional study included euthymic patients with UM (n=58), BD-I (n=58), and healthy control subjects (n=58). Diagnoses were established according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria, and euthymia was confirmed using the Young Mania Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in all groups and the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Scale (BDFS) in the UM and BD-I groups. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using a structured form. Group comparisons were conducted using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses. Results: Both patient groups demonstrated significantly impaired psychosocial functioning compared with healthy controls across all FAST subdomains (p<0.05). On the BDFS, patients with UM showed better emotional functioning and less social withdrawal than patients with BD-I (p<0.05); however, total functioning scores did not differ significantly between groups (p>0.05). Clinically, UM was characterized by manic-predominant onset, higher rates of mood-congruent psychotic symptoms, longer episode duration, and more frequent hospitalizations. Suicidal behavior and total number of mood episodes were higher among patients with BD-I (p<0.05). In the final logistic regression model, mood-congruent psychotic symptoms during the first episode were independently associated with UM relative to BD-I, whereas a history of suicide attempts was associated with lower odds of UM (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although both groups exhibited functional impairment, patients with UM demonstrated relatively better emotional and social functioning than those with BD-I. These findings suggest that UM may be associated with a distinct functional profile, with potential implications for prognosis and treatment planning. Incorporating functional outcomes into the clinical assessment of UM may help optimize therapeutic strategies and improve long-term psychosocial outcomes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15994Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14744/dajpns.2026.00324Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
İndeks kayıtları
Kaydın indeks veri tabanlarındaki sayfası (aktarımda alınan kayıt numarasıyla). Erişim, indeksin kendi koşullarına bağlıdır.
Atıflar
WoS
0
OpenAlex
0
Her kaynağın kendi saydığı toplam atıf; aktarım ve zenginleştirme sırasında alındı.
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSoygenc, Elcin Izmir
dc.contributor.authorOnur, Ozge Sahmelikoglu
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:26:18.538051682Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:26:18.538051682Z
dc.date.issued2026-06
dc.description.abstractObjective: Growing evidence suggests that unipolar mania (UM) may represent a distinct clinical condition rather than a subtype of bipolar disorder (BD). The present study aimed to compare the sociodemographic characteristics, clinical features, and psychosocial functioning of euthymic patients with UM or bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and healthy control subjects. Method: This cross-sectional study included euthymic patients with UM (n=58), BD-I (n=58), and healthy control subjects (n=58). Diagnoses were established according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria, and euthymia was confirmed using the Young Mania Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in all groups and the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Scale (BDFS) in the UM and BD-I groups. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using a structured form. Group comparisons were conducted using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses. Results: Both patient groups demonstrated significantly impaired psychosocial functioning compared with healthy controls across all FAST subdomains (p<0.05). On the BDFS, patients with UM showed better emotional functioning and less social withdrawal than patients with BD-I (p<0.05); however, total functioning scores did not differ significantly between groups (p>0.05). Clinically, UM was characterized by manic-predominant onset, higher rates of mood-congruent psychotic symptoms, longer episode duration, and more frequent hospitalizations. Suicidal behavior and total number of mood episodes were higher among patients with BD-I (p<0.05). In the final logistic regression model, mood-congruent psychotic symptoms during the first episode were independently associated with UM relative to BD-I, whereas a history of suicide attempts was associated with lower odds of UM (p<0.05). Conclusion: Although both groups exhibited functional impairment, patients with UM demonstrated relatively better emotional and social functioning than those with BD-I. These findings suggest that UM may be associated with a distinct functional profile, with potential implications for prognosis and treatment planning. Incorporating functional outcomes into the clinical assessment of UM may help optimize therapeutic strategies and improve long-term psychosocial outcomes.
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support. Use of AI for Writing Assistance: Not declared.
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/dajpns.2026.00324
dc.identifier.eissn1309-5749
dc.identifier.endpage123
dc.identifier.issn1018-8681
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage112
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/15994
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001797658500005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKARE PUBL
dc.relation.ispartofDUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBipolar disorder
dc.subjecteuthymia
dc.subjectfunctional outcome
dc.subjectpsychosocial functioning
dc.subjectunipolar mania
dc.subject.classificationPsychiatry
dc.subject.otherTURKISH VERSION
dc.subject.otherRELIABILITY
dc.subject.otherVALIDITY
dc.subject.otherSCALE
dc.subject.otherINVENTORY
dc.subject.otherANXIETY
dc.titleUnipolar mania as a distinct clinical presentation: Differences in illness course and psychosocial functioning compared with bipolar I disorder
dc.typeArticle
rdl.citation.openalex0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.oa.urlhttps://dusunenadamdergisi.org/storage/upload/pdfs/1781273866-en.pdf
rdl.scopus.quartileQ4
rdl.sdgSDG03
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)