Effect of basic parameters defining principal soil-structure interaction on seismic control of structures equipped with optimum tuned mass damper

MakaleAçık Erişim

Özet

One of the most effective systems for reducing dynamic responses of the structures subjected to earthquake excitations is tuned mass dampers (TMDs). In the traditional design theory of TMDs, the structures are assumed to be rigidly connected to the ground. Using this approach, known as the fixed foundation approach, may lead to deterioration of the performance of the TMD in cases where soil-structure interaction (SSI) is significant. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the SSI effects to obtain the optimum parameters of the TMDs. Unlike previous studies, two key parameters (i.e., structure-to-soil stiffness ratio and aspect ratio of the structure) are considered, which define the principal SSI effects on the effectiveness of TMD. For the aspect ratio of the structure, three different values (i.e., λ = 1, 2, and 4) are considered, these values correspond to the squat, ordinary, and slender structures representing traditional buildings, respectively. Four different values (i.e., a0 = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2) are also considered for the structure-soil stiffness ratio. This ratio being equal to 0 corresponds to the fixed foundation approach. This also demonstrates that the structure is constructed on hard rock. The optimum parameters of the TMD are obtained using the Jaya algorithm (JA). The proposed methodology is applied to three different buildings (i.e., 3-story, 6-story, and 12-story), and the optimum parameters of the TMD are verified using a total of 72 ground motions corresponding to NEHRP site classes C, D, and E. Numerical results show that the effectiveness of TMD is significantly affected by the basic parameters that define the principal SSI. In addition, the efficiency of the TMD is significantly related to the characteristics of the ground motions. It has been observed that TMD does not perform adequately in reducing vibrations in low-rise buildings (i.e., λ = 1) constructed on low-stiffness soils (i.e., a0 = 2).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14094Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAraz, Onur
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-22T10:22:14.217892168Z
dc.date.available2026-10-22T10:22:14.217892168Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractOne of the most effective systems for reducing dynamic responses of the structures subjected to earthquake excitations is tuned mass dampers (TMDs). In the traditional design theory of TMDs, the structures are assumed to be rigidly connected to the ground. Using this approach, known as the fixed foundation approach, may lead to deterioration of the performance of the TMD in cases where soil-structure interaction (SSI) is significant. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the SSI effects to obtain the optimum parameters of the TMDs. Unlike previous studies, two key parameters (i.e., structure-to-soil stiffness ratio and aspect ratio of the structure) are considered, which define the principal SSI effects on the effectiveness of TMD. For the aspect ratio of the structure, three different values (i.e., λ = 1, 2, and 4) are considered, these values correspond to the squat, ordinary, and slender structures representing traditional buildings, respectively. Four different values (i.e., a0 = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2) are also considered for the structure-soil stiffness ratio. This ratio being equal to 0 corresponds to the fixed foundation approach. This also demonstrates that the structure is constructed on hard rock. The optimum parameters of the TMD are obtained using the Jaya algorithm (JA). The proposed methodology is applied to three different buildings (i.e., 3-story, 6-story, and 12-story), and the optimum parameters of the TMD are verified using a total of 72 ground motions corresponding to NEHRP site classes C, D, and E. Numerical results show that the effectiveness of TMD is significantly affected by the basic parameters that define the principal SSI. In addition, the efficiency of the TMD is significantly related to the characteristics of the ground motions. It has been observed that TMD does not perform adequately in reducing vibrations in low-rise buildings (i.e., λ = 1) constructed on low-stiffness soils (i.e., a0 = 2).
dc.identifier.articlenumber109085
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109085
dc.identifier.eissn1879-341X
dc.identifier.issn0267-7261
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85209561616
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14094
dc.identifier.volume189
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001364537600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOptimum parameters
dc.subjectSeismic analysis
dc.subjectSeismic control
dc.subjectSoil-structure interaction
dc.subjectTuned mass damper
dc.subject.classificationEngineering, Geological
dc.subject.classificationGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
dc.subject.classificationEngineering
dc.subject.classificationGeology
dc.subject.otherDynamic response
dc.subject.otherEarthquakes
dc.subject.otherSeismic response
dc.subject.otherTall buildings
dc.subject.otherAspect-ratio
dc.subject.otherBasic parameters
dc.subject.otherOptimum parameters
dc.subject.otherSeismic analysis
dc.subject.otherSeismic control
dc.subject.otherSoil stiffness
dc.subject.otherSoil-structure interaction
dc.subject.otherSoil-Structure Interaction effects
dc.subject.otherStiffness ratios
dc.subject.otherTuned mass dampers
dc.subject.otheralgorithm
dc.subject.otheraspect
dc.subject.otherground motion
dc.subject.otherhard rock
dc.subject.othermultistorey building
dc.subject.otherstiffness
dc.subject.othervibration
dc.subject.otherSoil structure interactions
dc.titleEffect of basic parameters defining principal soil-structure interaction on seismic control of structures equipped with optimum tuned mass damper
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.openalex34
rdl.citation.scopus42
rdl.citation.wos38
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.oa.statuspreprint
rdl.oa.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/6435
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)