2026-10-23T16:03:15Zhttps://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request

oai:gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:gumushane/185502026-10-22T10:45:26Zopenairecom_gumushane_10000col_gumushane_10001

On “Parmenides’ Ontology:” A BeginningÖztürk, ÜmitBilim Felsefesi ve TarihiFelsefeWhat kind of philosophical (/and philological) methodology can appropriately be used is a matter of deep problem by examining thinkers especially such as Parmenides, Heraclitus, Anaximander because of the fact that only fragmental compilations of them could be preserved. Furthermore, when someone tries to concern the question of meaning or understanding of those fragments, things easily and perhaps involuntarily get a little out of hand. So to speak, the only difference between us and them is not time intervals but also reading comprehension skills being change through the history. During those times it was proclaimed silently that the essential “ergon” for human beings spring from out of reading the “gramma” imprinted onto “psukhē.” However, one can hardly read a written text properly nowadays. In this manner, the aim of this study will offers a kind of preliminary etude not of course a totally complete but some usual interpretations on Parmenides’ Peri Phuseōs so as to try to deactivate the so-called “Parmenides’ Onto-logy.”2017Articlehttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/18550trMavi Atlasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/gumushane/18550