2026-10-23T16:01:48Zhttps://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/requestoai:gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:gumushane/183072026-10-22T11:39:26Zopenairedrivercom_gumushane_10000col_gumushane_10001Did Logical Empiricism Kill Kuhn?Öztürk, ÜmitBilgisayar Bilimleri, Yazılım MühendisliğiBilim Felsefesi ve TarihiFelsefeBilgisayar Bilimleri, Teori ve MetotlarAfter his monumental work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, was published in 1962, Thomas Kuhn dealt with problems quite a long time such as rationality of scientific theories, theory choice and incommensurability on the axis of reconfiguration of the notion of paradigm. However, beginning from 80s, his on-going analysis aforementioned matters took its last shape with a new orientation including a linguistic turn. As a result of this renewal process, a controversial discussion aroused within the literature of philosophy of science which reaches to top at the 90s whether Kuhn is a genuine alternative to logical empiricism or not. In this study, we offer an assessment via temporarily suspending both Kuhn’s own socalled shift and related debates for a better understanding of his contributions to the philosophy of science by asking whether Kuhn had completed his essential project at the Revolutions or not.2018Articlehttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/18307https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.4843311303-4251trKaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/gumushane/18307