<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-23T13:46:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:gumushane/14200" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net:gumushane/14200</identifier><datestamp>2026-10-22T11:36:55Z</datestamp><setSpec>openaire</setSpec><setSpec>driver</setSpec><setSpec>com_gumushane_10000</setSpec><setSpec>col_gumushane_10001</setSpec><setSpec>com_gumushane_10007</setSpec><setSpec>col_gumushane_10180</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Innovation Climate in the Relationship Between Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Competence</dc:title><dc:creator>Karakaya Suzan, Ozge</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gül, Uğur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Koyuncu, Oğuz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Akdeniz, Canberk</dc:creator><dc:subject>artificial intelligence</dc:subject><dc:subject>clinical competence</dc:subject><dc:subject>health worker</dc:subject><dc:subject>nursing</dc:subject><dc:subject>organizational culture</dc:subject><dc:subject>self-efficacy</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into health care; however, how nurses’ attitudes toward AI and creative self-efficacy are associated with perceived clinical competence within different organizational contexts remains unclear. Aim: To examine whether perceived climate for innovation statistically mediates the association between nurses’ attitudes toward AI and perceived clinical competence and moderates the association between creative self-efficacy and perceived clinical competence. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 233 nurses recruited online by convenience sampling from hospitals in Türkiye between January and March 2026. Self-report measures assessed attitudes toward AI, creative self-efficacy, perceived climate for innovation, and perceived clinical competence. Pearson correlations and PROCESS Models 4 and 1 with 5000 bootstrap samples tested statistical mediation and moderation. Adjusted analyses included age, gender, previous AI-related training and AI use, educational level, professional experience, and institution type. Results: Attitudes toward AI were indirectly associated with perceived clinical competence through perceived climate for innovation; the adjusted indirect association remained significant (B = 0.0700, SE = 0.0333, 95% CI [0.0173, 0.1453]), consistent with partial statistical mediation. Perceived climate for innovation also moderated the association between creative self-efficacy and perceived clinical competence after adjustment (interaction B = −0.1672, SE = 0.0447, 95% CI [−0.2552, −0.0792]). This positive association became weaker as perceived climate for innovation increased. Conclusion: Attitudes toward AI, creative self-efficacy, perceived climate for innovation, and perceived clinical competence were significantly associated, and the statistical mediation and moderation patterns remained after adjustment. The cross-sectional, self-report data do not establish temporal or causal mechanisms or effects on objectively measured clinical performance or patient outcomes. Implications for Nursing Management: Nurse managers may consider supporting AI literacy, safe AI use, team-based learning, and innovation-supportive work environments. These strategies should be evaluated prospectively using objective clinical and patient outcomes before their effectiveness is inferred.</dc:description><dc:publisher>John Wiley and Sons Ltd</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/gumushane/14200</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/1528189</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>0966-0429</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>Journal of Nursing Management</dc:relation><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:identifier>https://gumushane-rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/tr/items/gumushane/14200</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>